George Russell wrote:
>
> Matt Harden wrote:
> > I don't think that's really true. If I understand it correctly, the
> > state can be any type; it doesn't have to fit in, say, an Int or other
> > small type. I think the Mersenne Twister could be implemented as an
> > instance of Random.RandomGe
Jerzy Karczmarczuk writes ("Re: Clean and Haskell"):
> Ian Jackson:
> > The operating system I run on my computers, Debian (www.debian.org),
> > consists only of software and documentation to which I have (or can
> > download) the source code, which I can use at work as well at home, to
> > which
The Haskell 1.4 Report states that instances of MonadZero and
MonadPlus should satisfy these laws:
m >> zero = zero
zero >>= m = zero
m ++ zero = m
zero ++ m = m
Now that MonadPlus has been moved out of the Prelude (and has changed
the names of all its operators), I see th
Haskell.org is now back up again.
Simon
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on Clean
on 9 Jan 2000
> [..]
> many other people there are some serious problems with using a
> language whose only implementation is not free software[1].
>
> Why should anyone want to tie themselves to a language with only one
> implementation, where yo
Subject: Re: Clean and Haskell
Steve Tarsk wrote:
T> I just want to say that Haskell is a fat old slow
T> dinosaur compared with Clean. Download Clean at
T> www.cs.kun.nl/~clean and get rid of your Haskell
T> installation.
T>
T> __
T> Do You Yahoo
Ian Jackson defends Haskell, and attacks Clean for "obvious reasons"
Clean is not free, etc. :
> The operating system I run on my computers, Debian (www.debian.org),
> consists only of software and documentation to which I have (or can
> download) the source code, which I can use at work as well
