> Does anyone know where there is some information on Haskell integration
with
> the Microsoft NGWS runtime, which provides
> cross language integration and a common system for memory managment,
library
> functions etc.
>
> I am curious to see if the haskell integration is a good fit or a graunch
Thu, 27 Jul 2000 23:59:47 +0100, Claus Reinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Whenever a type is qualified by a class context, this establishes
> a proof obligation for the class mechanism, and while this mechanism
> tries to complete the proof, it also collects and composes the
> functional progra
Does anyone know where there is some information on Haskell integration with
the Microsoft NGWS runtime, which provides
cross language integration and a common system for memory managment, library
functions etc.
I am curious to see if the haskell integration is a good fit or a graunch
(square pe
Does anyone know where there is some information on Haskell integration with
the Microsoft NGWS runtime, which provides
cross language integration and a common system for memory managment, library
functions etc.
I am curious to see if the haskell integration is a good fit or a graunch
(square pe
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check http://www.counter4all.com/omcounter.asp
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, S.D.Mechveliani wrote:
> And there arises a question.
> To make the implementation accessible, the paper file has to be
> included there as the necessary part of documentation. Maybe, not
> literally the paper, but something that 90% coincides with it.
> On the other hand
Dear Haskellers,
This a report on the recent state of the Basic algebra proposal
(basAlgPropos).
And I need certain political advice about it.
There is also a section about Cayenne.
basAlgPropos was revised. The sample argument (SA) approach remains.
It was written a paper about this (12 page
