How about turning ghc into a compilation server ?
It would run as a daemon waiting for network
connections, retrieve source files (through the
same network socket, or nfs, or cvs, ...), compile
them locally, and send back the result.
This would prevent having to reload the compiler
for each file -
the benefits may not be as great as you suppose, modern operating
systems keep a buffer cache which contains all recently used data in
memory including executables, if your machine is not memory limited
(such that the OS would have to throw away your ghc pages to make room
for something else) then
John Meacham wrote:
> the benefits may not be as great as you suppose, modern operating
> systems keep a buffer cache which contains all recently used data in
> memory including executables, if your machine is not memory limited
> (such that the OS would have to throw away your ghc pages to make
Sebastien Carlier wrote:
> How about turning ghc into a compilation server ?
> It would run as a daemon waiting for network
> connections, retrieve source files (through the
> same network socket, or nfs, or cvs, ...), compile
> them locally, and send back the result.
> This would prevent having t
> How about turning ghc into a compilation server ?
> It would run as a daemon waiting for network
> connections, retrieve source files (through the
> same network socket, or nfs, or cvs, ...), compile
> them locally, and send back the result.
> This would prevent having to reload the compiler
> f
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 01:49:25 -0800, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Funny you should say that. The next version of GHC (5.00 - to be
> released soon) will have hmake-like functionality enabling it to
> compile multiple modules without exiting,
How to specify .c files to be linked in?
Or
The following two research assistant positions
are available at the University of Bremen, Germany.
The Bremen Institute of Safe Systems in the Center for Computing
Technologies at the University of Bremen hosts the research projects
"Multi-logic systems as a basis for heterogeneous specificati
Hi all,
The Haskell report defines the fixity of (\\) to be:
infix 5 \\
I propose that it gets the following fixity:
infixl 5 \\
This means that one can write:
as \\ bs \\ cs \\ ds
Which means:
(((as \\ bs) \\ cs) \\ ds)
I think that one less often means the following:
as \\ (b
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Koen Claessen wrote:
> I propose that it gets the following fixity:
>
> infixl 5 \\
Unless the it's common usage outside of Haskell, I oppose!
Getting
List> [1,2,3]\\[2]\\[3]
ERROR: Ambiguous use of operator "(\\)" with "(\\)"
at compile time does no harm, but ge
I apologise if this is off topic for this list - I haven't been here long.
Someone recently mentioned that the MD5 function in GHC uses C code to do the
work so returns an IO String rather than a String. I have written an MD5
implementation in pure Haskell code (following the RFC - I don't know
OK, I've figured it out. In this O'Haskell statement,
> struct Derived < Base =
> value :: Int
...Derived is not, in fact, a subtype of Base. Derived and Base are
disjoint types, but an implicit map of type "Derived -> Base" has been
defined.
--
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
Hello!
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> [...]
> primes :: Int -> [Int]
> primes how_much = sieve [2..how_much] where
> sieve (p:x) =
> p : (if p <= mybound
> then sieve (remove (p*p) x)
> else x) where
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
