Re: Here you have, ;o)

2001-02-12 Thread head
NOTE that the attachment to the orginal message is a virus.. Do not open --- delete email--- do not save attachment On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, David Wilczynski wrote: > Hi: > Check This! > ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.or

Re: Problem reading files...

2001-02-12 Thread andrew
Are you on a Windows platform of some kind (I guess so, from your mail headers)? I vaguely remember having a problem like this (in Python, IIRC) because MSDOS used ^Z (ASCII 26) as an end of file marker. So low-level Win32 file access routines still interpret this character as end-of-file. I g

Re: Problem reading files...

2001-02-12 Thread Sven Panne
> Andre W B Furtado wrote: > [ EOF at Ctrl-Z problem ] Sounds like you're using WinDoze which interprets Ctrl-Z as EOF in non-binary files IIRC (great idea, BTW! :-}. Alas, you have to use non-standard features (openFileEx or hSetBinaryMode) to get around this, see: http://www.haskell.org/ghc

RE: kind inference question

2001-02-12 Thread Mark P Jones
Hi Bernie, You ask why Haskell infers kinds for datatypes in dependency order. As you point out, if Haskell tried instead to infer kinds for all of the datatypes in a program at the same time, then it would sometimes accept programs that are currently rejected. For example: |data C x = Foo

Problem reading files...

2001-02-12 Thread Andre W B Furtado
    Hello there. I was trying to read a bitmap file using hGetChar but I had a problem: if the file contains the byte 26-decimal (or 1A-hexa)  the program aborts. Here you have the output:   Fail: end of file Action: hGetChar       Since hGetChar is implemented with getc, I created a similar

WARNING [ was: Re: Here you have, ;o) ]

2001-02-12 Thread Martin Erwig
Don't open the file that is attached to the original message!! I was warned that it contains a virus! -- Martin ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Here you have, ;o)

2001-02-12 Thread David Wilczynski
Hi: Check This! AnnaKournikova.jpg.vbs

Re: Revamping the numeric classes

2001-02-12 Thread Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:02:00 +0100 (MET), Bjorn Lisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > Functions themselves are never lifted. They just appear to be lifted > when applied to arguments of certain types, and then the function > application is always statically resolved into an expression where > the func