Albert Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I try to build ghc 4.08.2 with parallelism turned on, i.e.,
GhcLibsWays=mp.
At ghc/rts/parallel/HLComms.c line 550:
GarbageCollect(GetRoots);
it barfs because the new GarbageCollect() function expects a boolean
parameter after the first
[This sort of thing is probably better on the list, because it doesn't
really isolate a bug]
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 07:25:29 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bug #133086] complete failure
Bug #133086, was updated on
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:53:41 +1100, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Strange - meanwhile, I have put release 0.10.4 out.
Among other things, it finally has an `install' target.
Thanks, everything compiles and mostly works. Examples still behave
strangely: rngtest goes crazy when
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Ken Shan wrote:
On 2001-02-16T09:52:41+0100, Lars Lundgren wrote:
This is ad hoc overloading, and IMHO bad style, at least in haskell. As I
understand it, haskell type classes were never intended to support this.
Well, whether this is ad hoc overloading depends on
I don't know if this is a bug in Hugs 98, or whether it's a
misunderstanding of mine.
The Haskell 98 Report Sec. 4.2.2 claims that 'type' introduces a new type
constructor. Yet it doesn't seem possible to declare the type constructor
an instance of a class:
--
class MyClass c where
Ashley Yakeley wrote:
I don't know if this is a bug in Hugs 98, or whether it's a
misunderstanding of mine.
The Haskell 98 Report Sec. 4.2.2 claims that 'type' introduces a new type
constructor. Yet it doesn't seem possible to declare the type constructor
an instance of a class:
--
On 19-Feb-2001, Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if this is a bug in Hugs 98, or whether it's a
misunderstanding of mine.
The Haskell 98 Report Sec. 4.2.2 claims that 'type' introduces a new type
constructor.
Right. So by definition, it does.
Yet it doesn't seem
At 2001-02-19 06:34, Fergus Henderson wrote:
As the Haskell Report section 4.2.2 says:
| Type constructor symbols T introduced by type synonym declarations
| cannot be partially applied; it is a static error to use T without the
| full number of arguments.
Thanks, I missed that. How
In the Haskell community is there a generally accepted best way to
approach Literate Programming? The language has support for literate
comments, but it seems that many common LP tools don't respect it.
I don't know whether you'd regard this as literate programming,
but there's a move afoot
In the Haskell community is there a generally accepted best way to
approach Literate Programming? The language has support for literate
comments, but it seems that many common LP tools don't respect it.
I'm also very interested in this, but ideally I would want the output to
be in
10 matches
Mail list logo
