Lennart:
> There is no problem, [the meaning of numeric literals is] clearly specified by the
>report.
> (There is a problem with Hugs, it doesn't implement literals properly.
> Or has that ancient bug been fixed?)
Lennart is absolutely right, the report is quite unambiguous and there is
(still
Jens-Ulrik Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> I checked c2hs-cvs a couple of days ago, and am wondering if
> anyone has any patches yet for building c2hs under ghc5? I
> guess it is just a matter of tweaking the config files a
> bit. So if noone else has had time yet, I will try to do it
> s
"S.D.Mechveliani" wrote:
> Can we solve and close the problem of the meaning of decimal pointed
> leterals?
There is no problem, it's clearly specified by the report.
(There is a problem with Hugs, it doesn't implement literals properly.
Or has that ancient bug been fixed?)
> > "The floating p
Can we solve and close the problem of the meaning of decimal pointed
leterals?
To my
| People wrote about toRational (0.9) == 9%10 = False
| ...
| Probably, the source of a `bug' is a language agreement that the
| input is in decimal representation (`0.9') and its meaning
