Yes, it's the same as exporting just B(..) or B(C).
I guess I should try to make this clearer.
S
| -Original Message-
| From: Sigbjorn Finne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: 11 September 2001 20:31
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Haskell98 undefinedness
|
|
| What's the meaning o
A thought to dicscuss for next year's Haskell
workshop. This is the second year running that
there have been no submissions accepted in the
`application letters' category for the Haskell
workshop. It seems that this comes from the
fact that these are not getting the same grades
as submissions fo
There was a discussion at the Haskell workshop on the
future of the language. It would be great to have some
sort of minutes from this for those who were unable to
attend. I gather that a standard GUI was mentioned; I'd
particularly like to hear about what, if anything, was
resolved about that.
Here a short summary by Malcolm and me of the final discussion at the
Haskell workshop:
First Simon Peyton Jones stated that the Haskell'98 Report continues to
be revised in small ways for correctness and readability. He will
continue this
until a whole month passes with no further changes, the
> ... there have been no submissions accepted in the
> `application letters' category for the Haskell workshop.
that seems strange indeed. two reasons come to mind:
a) there ARE no proper real world applications of Haskell
(only a rather large number of so called pearls)
b) these things do e
Olaf Chitil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> summarised the 10 minute talks
of this years Haskell workshop, including my presentation:
> Wolfram Kahl: Animating Haskell by Term Graph Rewriting
> HOPS is a system for term graph rewriting that can also show the
> rewriting steps in a graphical animation. [...]
It seems like a common thread is a shortage of willing programming effort
so that things may be maintained and improved. Would it be worth thinking
about how to promote Haskell in communities where people might be willing
and able to contribute to the work?
(Much thanks to the people who are alre
Johannes Waldmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ... there have been no submissions accepted in the
>> `application letters' category for the Haskell workshop.
Really?
> a) there ARE no proper real world applications of Haskell
>(only a rather large number of so called pearls)
> b) these t
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:04:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A thought to dicscuss for next year's Haskell workshop. This is the
> second year running that there have been no submissions accepted in the
> `application letters' category for the Haskell workshop.
A minor point: last year i
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:00:38 +0100, Olaf Chitil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Mark Shields: Lightweight Modules for Haskell
> Shortly stated that he is working on a new module system and would like
> every interested person to join.
I'm interested. How to join?
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL
Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:00:35 -0700, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Please check it out. My plan is that if I hear nothing for a month,
> I'll freeze it. Otherwise I'll iterate.
I'll send some minor issues in September (much less than before
it seems). Please wait...
--
__("<
Hello,
Recently, Craig Delehanty discovered that there is
a difference in behaviour of putStr "a\tb" between
Hugs and WinHugs (see comp.lang.functional).
Hugs interprets it as a alignment character:
>putStr "a\tb"
"a b"
>
(7 spaces)
but in WinHugs, it is always the same as 8 spaces:
>pu
So, it's not considered an error if you do something
like
module A ( B(C), ...some other stuff..., B(D) ) where
...
data B = C | D
but C and D is exported. Is the extra flexibility of
allowing duplicates really worth it?
--sigbjorn
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Peyton-Jon
12 Sep 2001 12:37:25 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> * Currently HOPS implements only one evaluation strategy,
> namely leftmost outermost graph rewriting with sharing preservation
> (without automatic sharing maximisation).
> With the standard rules in place, this co
This is an area of grave concern for me. I am still quite new to Haskell, so
perhaps I should wait until others have spoken, but I'll go ahead anyway. I
certainly don't mean to offend anyone, so please bear with me.
Speaking as an 'industrial' programmer who gave a 30-minute application
presentat
hello,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 08:51:20AM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
>
> So, it's not considered an error if you do something
> like
>
> module A ( B(C), ...some other stuff..., B(D) ) where
> ...
> data B = C | D
>
> but C and D is exported. Is the extra flexibility of
> allowing du
I think there's a lot of truth in all you said in your message and I
make the following comment merely as a point of information.
> I think I speak for the majority of 'industrial' programmers when I
> say Haskell is a very difficult language to approach. I believe a
> great deal of this difficu
> I think there's a lot of truth in all you said in your message and I
> make the following comment merely as a point of information.
[Bryn Keller]
Thanks very much, I was hoping my comments would be taken
constructively.
> > I think I speak for the majority of 'industrial' pro
18 matches
Mail list logo
