On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:27:06AM +0200, Volker Stolz wrote:
> In local.haskell, you wrote:
> > test: no threads to run: infinite loop or deadlock?
> > My problem is that this behavior is actually desired, but
> > how do I catch this exception and do some bookkeeping
> > (closing external IO, et
On 01-Aug-2002, Hal Daume III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I'm dumb and can't figure this out. I'm migrating hMPI from GHC
> 4.08 to GHC 5.04 (fun fun) and am having trouble writing an instance of
> Storable. The relevant information is:
>
> > import Foreign.Storable
> > type MPI_Rank_Typ
G'day all.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:50:55PM -0700, Hal Daume III wrote:
> I need a data structure which is a map from Ints to Doubles; the
> distribution of the Ints is in the range say 0-2 and a map will
> contain somewhere around 100-200 elements. I need to be able to query
> *very* qui
Hal Daume III writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for some advice on what's the cleanest way to implement
> something. The basic idea is that I have a task to solve, T. There are
> many steps to solving this task, but they can be broken down into a small
> list of elementary steps:
>
> - prepare
Hal Daume III writes:
| Hi all,
|
| I'm looking for some advice on what's the cleanest way to implement
| something.
:
| where the main driver does something like:
|
| prepareData
| initialize
| iterate until converged
| doThingOne
| doThingTwo
| getResults
|
| As
> > One way to do this would be to import all of the models qualified and then
> > if they choose Model0, pass to the "go" function Model0.prepareData,
> > Model0.initialize, etc. This is fine, simple, good. But it doesn't
> > enforce at all the types of the functions.
>
> I don't understand wh
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:34:00PM -0700, Hal Daume III wrote:
> ...
> Now, I want in my executable my user to be able to say "-model=0" and so
> on in the command line and for it to use the appropriate model. Each of
> these models will go in a separate module.
>
> One way to do this would be t
Hi all,
I'm looking for some advice on what's the cleanest way to implement
something. The basic idea is that I have a task to solve, T. There are
many steps to solving this task, but they can be broken down into a small
list of elementary steps:
- prepareData
- initialize
- doThingOne
Okay, I'm dumb and can't figure this out. I'm migrating hMPI from GHC
4.08 to GHC 5.04 (fun fun) and am having trouble writing an instance of
Storable. The relevant information is:
> import Foreign.Storable
> type MPI_Rank_Type = Int
> newtype MPI_Rank = MPI_Rank MPI_Rank_Type deriving (Eq)
>
Richard Uhtenwoldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Similar ideas are already in circulation --since the 70s in the
> research OS community in fact-- but dressed not in the guise of the
> monad but rather in the guise of something called a capability as in
> "capability OSes" like GNOSSIS, KeyKOS, E
In local.haskell, you wrote:
> test: no threads to run: infinite loop or deadlock?
> My problem is that this behavior is actually desired, but
> how do I catch this exception and do some bookkeeping
> (closing external IO, etc.) and then a proper exit?
You can wrap the `takeMVar' with Exception.
My program runs 3 threads, and after a few minutes' execution
all threads come to a state that they all wait on some MVars,
then the program halts with an error:
test: no threads to run: infinite loop or deadlock?
(test is my program name)
My problem is that this behavior is actually desired,
12 matches
Mail list logo
