Re: [OT] Teaching Haskell in High School

2003-02-03 Thread John Peterson
I've also been working high school students a bit and functional programming is a great way to teach the principals of computation. The best results come when FP is applied to domains that get kids excited. I've had very good luck with Haskore as an excellent way to bring computation to a general

Re: [OT] Teaching Haskell in High School

2003-02-03 Thread Hamilton Richards
I had the good fortune to teach Haskell to some thousand freshmen a few years ago, and noticed that some who did especially well had no previous programming experience. This supports Wolfgang Jeltsch's claim that Haskell is not inherently difficult to learn. I've taught similar numbers of stu

PLC 27: call for participation

2003-02-03 Thread Sophia A. Malamud
Dear friends and colleagues, Please circulate this announcement and call for registration! We apologise for multiple mailings. 27th Penn Linguistics Colloquium

Re: [OT] Teaching Haskell in High School (fwd)

2003-02-03 Thread Rex Page
This matches my experience, too. When I've taught Haskell to first year college students, there have always been some hard core hackers who've been at it in C or VB or Perl or something like that for years, and they rarely take kindly to Haskell. The ones without any programming background do bette

Re: [OT] Teaching Haskell in High School

2003-02-03 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
On Tuesday, 2003-02-04, 01:01, CET, Hal Daume wrote: > [...] > However, I'm also well aware that Haskell is very difficult to learn (and, > I'd imagine, to teach). Hi, I wouldn't claim that Haskell is very difficult to learn. I think, people often have problems with learning Haskell because the

[OT] Teaching Haskell in High School

2003-02-03 Thread Hal Daume III
Hi all, Before getting in to this, let me preface my question(s) with a note that I have checked through the Haskell in Education web page and have found various links off there of interest (and I've googled, etc. In short: I've done my homework). That said, I've been in rather close corresponde

RE: time since the epoch

2003-02-03 Thread George Russell
Simon PJ wrote (snipped) > Meanwhile, I suspect there's an opportunity for someone (or a small > group) to suggest a new Time library that really does the business, and > provide an implementation. If it's sufficiently persuasive, all the > implementations will adopt it and it can become a de-fact

Haskell Workshop 2003

2003-02-03 Thread Johan Jeuring
ACM SIGPLAN 2003 Haskell Workshop Uppsala, Sweden, End of August 2003 pending approval http://www.functional-programming.org/HaskellWorkshop/cfp03.html Call For Papers The Haskell Workshop forms part of the PLI 2003 colloquiu

Re: ANNOUNCE: Helium, for learning Haskell

2003-02-03 Thread Andres Loeh
> Unfortunately, readline history and line-editing commands > do not work at the /usr/local/bin/hi prompt. > One would think they would because before I had readline-dev installed > Helium refused to build. Oh well! This can hopefully be fixed by applying the simple patch that I have attached.

RE: time since the epoch

2003-02-03 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| the haskell 98 time library is horribly broken, if you are using ghc, | you can deconstruct the time constructor which has an Integer containing | the number of seconds since epoch... otherwise you can use | ... | I dont supose this could be considered a typo in the haskell 98 report? | it is a