On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 02:06:44PM +1000, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
> G'day all.
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:08:25AM -0400, Dylan Thurston wrote:
>
> > What's wrong with that solution?
>
> Working with these operators, I would spend a significant amount of
> time getting the '<' and '>' notatio
G'day all.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:08:16AM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
> Mere overload resolution (over monomorphic types) is not NP-hard. (This
> is only a common misconception.)
No, but as you note below, the "interesting" cases are. Most
of the more interesting number-like types are p
G'day all.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:08:25AM -0400, Dylan Thurston wrote:
> What's wrong with that solution?
Working with these operators, I would spend a significant amount of
time getting the '<' and '>' notations right rather than writing
code. I don't like that.
For example, using the sug
Please ignore my stupid question :)
--
Hal Daume III | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Arrest this man, he talks in maths." | www.isi.edu/~hdaume
> -Original Message-
> From: Hal Daume
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
K. Fritz Ruehr (Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:19:55PM -0700):
c0 = ($) -- application
> c1 = (.) -- good old composition
>
> c2 = (.) . (.)-- my (.<) from above
>
> c3 = (.) . (.) . (.)
>
> c4 = (.) . (.) . (.) . (.)
>
>
Hal Daume wrote:
Suppose I have:
module M1 where
import M2
foo = 'a'
and
module M2 where
import M3
and
module M3 where
foo = True
Now, inside M1, I want to write something like:
bar = if M2.foo then M1.foo else 'b'
M2 must reexport "foo":
module M2 (foo) where
import M3
__
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:29:35 +0800
"Liu Junfeng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi__
> If there is a function named "func" with type a->b in a win32 dll
> file. In Hugs use the primitive declaration:
> ---
> primitive prim_func :: a -> b
> func = prim_func
> ---
Suppose I have:
> module M1 where
> import M2
> foo = 'a'
and
> module M2 where
> import M3
and
> module M3 where
> foo = True
Now, inside M1, I want to write something like:
> bar = if M2.foo then M1.foo else 'b'
or
> bar = if M3.foo then M1.foo else 'b'
but neither of these is valid. Is
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:39:48AM +1000, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
> > Someone mentioned multiplying by a scalar. I think this is a
> > good application, but what we need is to agree (somehow) on
> > the symbol used. I've used (*.) and (.*), with the dot being
> > on the side the scalar is on (on th
Announcing the release of buddha version 0.9
www.cs.mu.oz.au/~bjpop/buddha
Buddha is a declarative debugger for Haskell 98. It is based on program
transformation and relies on GHC version 5.04 or greater (but not version 6
yet). It also needs GHC's
Hi，
If there is a function named "func" with type a->b in a win32 dll file.
In Hugs use the primitive declaration:
---
primitive prim_func :: a -> b
func = prim_func
---
Then the func can be exported to be used in other modules.
The question
Andrew J Bromage wrote:
Of course you could always allow overloading _without_ requiring
module qualification (unless the overloading can't be resolved
using type information). It'd make type checking NP-hard, but I
seem to recall that it's already more complex than that.
Mere overload resolution
12 matches
Mail list logo
