[snip]
> If you're using an eager haskell implementation which does some speculative
> evaluation of things that look cheap and that you might want to evaluate, the
> answer is probably no. (Because, having decided to do some speculative work
> in the absence of a demand, it might decide it h
At 17:39 29/08/03 -0700, Hal Daume III wrote:
Hi fellow Haskellers,
I'm attempting to get a sense of the topology of the Haskell
community. Based on the Haskell Communities & Activities reports, it
seems that the large majority of people use Haskell for Haskell's sake.
If you use Haskell for a pu
I do research into parsing algorthms, and find that I can convert
the theory into practice most easily in Haskell. A lot of the material
is just (careful) transliteration of the original definitions. And
more generally I go along with Vincenzo (aka Nick Name),
> I use haskell when I have to write
