On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:15:53PM -0800, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Henrik Berg wrote:
>
> >... I was able to compile Fudgets when I removed 6.0.1, using
> >only 5.04.3.
> >
> >Still don't understand why I coudn't get it compile with 6.0.1,
> >though.
> >
> fudgets-030806.src.tar.gz compiles with
hello,
i don't quite agree with this.
if something is "undefined" as in the prelude, i should be able to prove
that this is the case
-- bottom is just another value, admitedly not a very nice one :-)
on the other hand, if something is undefined in the specification
(i.e. implementer can do whate
On 2004.01.21 15:03, Iavor S. Diatchki wrote:
> hi,
> not that it matters, but i think commonly when specifications say
> that something is undefined, that means that the behaviour can be whatever,
> i.e. the implementors can do what they like. this is not to be confused
> with the entity "undefi
On 2004.01.21 15:03, Iavor S. Diatchki wrote:
> hi,
> not that it matters, but i think commonly when specifications say
> that something is undefined, that means that the behaviour can be whatever,
> i.e. the implementors can do what they like. this is not to be confused
> with the entity "undef
Am Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2004 23:03 schrieb Iavor S. Diatchki:
> hi,
>
> not that it matters, but i think commonly when specifications say that
> something is undefined, that means that the behaviour can be whatever, i.e.
> the implementors can do what they like. this is not to be confused with the
> Fudgets does not yet compile with GHC 6.2, however, since _casm_ (which
> very conveniently allowed you to include C code fragments in your
> Haskell code) is no longer supported. [...] Is there a
> convenient way to do things like this without _casm_?
Depending on how many casms you have, you
hi,
not that it matters, but i think commonly when specifications say
that something is undefined, that means that the behaviour can be whatever,
i.e. the implementors can do what they like. this is not to be confused
with the entity "undefined" defined in the Prelude.
-iavor
Wolfgang Jeltsch wro
Am Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2004 21:52 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch:
> Hello,
>
> I have some code which runs fine with GHC/GHCi but signals
> Program error: undefined array element
> when run with Hugs. Does anyone know why this difference occurs and where
> I have to search for the cause of the erro
Henrik Berg wrote:
... I was able to compile Fudgets when I removed 6.0.1, using
only 5.04.3.
Still don't understand why I coudn't get it compile with 6.0.1,
though.
fudgets-030806.src.tar.gz compiles with GHC 6.0.1.
Fudgets does not yet compile with GHC 6.2, however, since _casm_ (which
very
Hello,
I have some code which runs fine with GHC/GHCi but signals
Program error: undefined array element
when run with Hugs. Does anyone know why this difference occurs and where I
have to search for the cause of the error in my code?
Wolfgang
__
Henrik Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I've been trying for a while now to install the Fudget GUI library
> (http://www.cs.chalmers.se/ComputingScience/Research/Functional/Fudgets/),
> but with no luck so far. I've tried many different versions,
> both source and binary, but it seems l
Hi!
I've been trying for a while now to install the Fudget GUI library
(http://www.cs.chalmers.se/ComputingScience/Research/Functional/Fudgets/),
but with no luck so far. I've tried many different versions,
both source and binary, but it seems like there's some kind of
dependency or something tha
Graham Klyne wrote:
> So the requirement for inter-process communication here is to run an
> external program and receive any data that it may return?
exactly, the one and only reason
> HTTP access is not my immediate concern. I'll go back to the test harness
> that I'm trying to build, and see
Apologies for multiple copies
CALL FOR PAPERS
Workshop on Constraint Programming and Constraint for Verification (CP+CV'04)
March 28, Barcelona, Spain
at the
14 matches
Mail list logo
