Re: [Haskell] KDevelop & Haskell

2004-02-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Monday 09 February 2004 16:19, Gour wrote: > > > > Well the plugin _is_ included in the 3.0 release > > (libkdevhaskellsupport.*) but it is deactivated due to stability reasons. > > How it can be activated? It can be activated by modifying a few Makefiles but i wouldn't try it at the moment sin

Re: [Haskell] Re: non-ASCII characters in Haddock documentation

2004-02-15 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Sonntag, 15. Februar 2004 22:14 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch: > [...] > So the logical thing would be if, e.g., "ß" would be translated to the > HTML code "ß" in order to show up as "ß" in the browser. In fact, Haddock behaves this way. (just checked) > [...] Wolfgang

Re: [Haskell] Re: non-ASCII characters in Haddock documentation

2004-02-15 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Sonntag, 15. Februar 2004 06:01 schrieb Ashley Yakeley: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > how do I insert non-ASCII and maybe even non-Latin-1 characters in > > Haddock documentation? > > Can't you use HTML entities? Haddock isn't restricted

[Haskell] "exists" keyword and "existential" types

2004-02-15 Thread Ben Rudiak-Gould
I find myself confused by the lack of an "exists" quantifier to complement "forall". It imposes seemingly arbitrary restrictions on the ways in which types can be expressed, and makes some seemingly harmless (and useful) types entirely inexpressible. For example, it seems as though runST could j