mechvel:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 04:06:22PM +0100, Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> >
> > > Alexander is right.
> > >
> > > Also as Integer has more sense than Int,
> > >
> >
> > To ask a silly question, is Int defined as 32 bits or is it define
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:09:18PM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote:
> "Serge D. Mechveliani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Alexander is right.
> >
> > Also as Integer has more sense than Int,
> > I would suggest for the future standard Haskell library to have
> > Integer as default. For example
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 04:06:22PM +0100, Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
>
> > Alexander is right.
> >
> > Also as Integer has more sense than Int,
> >
>
> To ask a silly question, is Int defined as 32 bits or is it defined in a
> similar vein to C'
G'day all.
Quoting "S. Alexander Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'll cite that hoary Hoare quotation here.
> "Premature optimization is the root of all evil."
Agreed! In particular, functions meant for general use, especially in
the standard library, should not optimise for a specific case an
simonmar:
>
>
> The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.2.1
>
>
> We are pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of the Glasgow
> Haskell Compil
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 21:21:09 +0200, Remi Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 08:58:53PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Montag, 26. April 2004 20:45 schrieb Don Groves:
> Some languages handle the Int/Integer question automatically,
> determined by the size of the integer in
"Serge D. Mechveliani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander is right.
>
> Also as Integer has more sense than Int,
> I would suggest for the future standard Haskell library to have
> Integer as default. For example:
> length :: [a] -> Integer
>
If you want to pass in a splittable supply, I recommend saving
yourself the trouble of building the plumbing. Instead, try the
Supply library which I wrote a few years back:
http://csg.lcs.mit.edu/~earwig/haskell-lib/index.html
You can create a splittable supply of channels using
> chanSu
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 08:58:53PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 26. April 2004 20:45 schrieb Don Groves:
> > Some languages handle the Int/Integer question automatically,
> > determined by the size of the integer in question. Int is used
> > until the integer excedes what the underl
Am Montag, 26. April 2004 20:45 schrieb Don Groves:
> [...]
> Hello, Haskell newbie here.
>
> Some languages handle the Int/Integer question automatically,
> determined by the size of the integer in question. Int is used
> until the integer excedes what the underlying architecture can
> handle, t
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:20:10 +0200, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps one could drop the Int/Integer distinction altogether if there was
a global switch for what "Int" should mean. But separate compilation and the
FFI would complicate things quite a bit then, I guess.
Hello, Haskell n
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Robert Will wrote:
> I understand the Int type to be as large as pointers on each kind of
> hardware. So one cannot possible have any data structure whose size
> doesn't fit in an Int.
If my data structure is created/destroyed lazily,
I don't see why not. Trivially, [0..2^12
Robert Will wrote:
I understand the Int type to be as large as pointers on each kind of
hardware. [...]
... excluding "unimportant" architectures like DEC Alpha (at least with
one of DEC's early C compilers), x86 in real mode, tons of embedded
processors in hundreds of millions of mobile phones, di
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 03:18:20PM -0400, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
> >
> >[..]
> > Dell's Poweredge servers address up to 32GB of
> > memory today! There are already 5.7 billion
> > people on the planet (>2^31) and 741 million phone
> > lines. In my mind, there is NO QUESTION that 2^31
> >
Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To ask a silly question, is Int defined as 32 bits or is it defined in a
> > similar vein to C's int?
>
> I think it is defined to cover at least the numbers from
> -(2 ^ 27) + 1
> to
> 2 ^ 27 - 1.
Actually, according to section 6.4 of the
Am Montag, 26. April 2004 17:06 schrieb Philippa Cowderoy:
> [...]
> To ask a silly question, is Int defined as 32 bits or is it defined in a
> similar vein to C's int?
I think it is defined to cover at least the numbers from
-(2 ^ 27) + 1
to
2 ^ 27 - 1.
So its exact range is implementati
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> Alexander is right.
>
> Also as Integer has more sense than Int,
>
To ask a silly question, is Int defined as 32 bits or is it defined in a
similar vein to C's int?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Haskell
Alexander is right.
Also as Integer has more sense than Int,
I would suggest for the future standard Haskell library to have
Integer as default. For example:
length :: [a] -> Integer
smallLength :: [a] -> Int
---
[ Apologies for multiple copies which are unavoidable. -Michael. ]
First Call for Papers/Abstracts/System descriptions
UNIF 2004
18th International Workshop on Unification
July 4-5, 2004, Cork, Ireland
** WSC9 - Call for Papers ***
### FREE ONLINE CONFERENCE ###
WSC9: 9th Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications
September 20th - October 08th, 2004
** On the World Wide Web **
Conference URL: http://www.cs.nmt.edu/~wsc9/
Mirror: http://wsc9.softcomputing.net/
Ge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there.
I got this question while I'm messing around with my toy monad.
I was thinking about creating a generic monad that can persist state change
even when fail is called. The StateT monad will discard the state change so
it makes it hard to add tracing to the progra
On Friday 23 April 2004 20:05, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
> Yes, that makes sense, but I'm ok with passing in
> an identity. I'd like a function like this:
>
> newChanSafe::Identity -> Chan a
> type Identity = Double -- or whatever
As Nick observes, using this function would require you to
22 matches
Mail list logo
