Maybe you can find useful information here:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html
or at least contact the FSF by e-mail.
Antonio Regidor Garcia
--- MR K P SCHUPKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Re LGPL...
>
> I beleive it is acceptable to supply source code on request, and
> you should
Re LGPL...
I beleive it is acceptable to supply source code on request, and
you should make it clear in the distributed code that the source
for gmp is available on request.
Keean.
___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailm
IANAL but my take on this is:
> Accompany the work with the complete corresponding
> machine-readable source code for the Library including whatever changes
> were used in the work (which must be distributed under Sections 1 and 2
> above);
Including a pointer to a GHC tarfile or CVS tree
For past year or so, a group of us at ARM having been developing some
software in Haskell. We have recently discovered that there may be a
licensing problem if we wish to release a Windows version of the
software. No doubt others have encountered the same problem, so we would
be very grateful for a
