I didn't think that this could be a function definition.
Thank you.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Lippmeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 2:41 PM
> To: Jinwoo Lee
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Haskell] Strange "let"
>
>
> Ha!,
>
> What you've
Ha!,
What you've done is redefine the (+) function.. try 10 + 30 and see what
you get.
Your local definition shadows the "real" (+) function defined in the
prelude.
let a + b = 3
is equivalent to
let (+) a b = 3
...
Jinwoo Lee wrote:
Hi,
I'm a Haskell newbie.
I was trying several things with GH
Hi,
I'm a Haskell newbie.
I was trying several things with GHCi and found out that the expression "let
a + b = 3" does not generate any errors.
Prelude> let a + b = 3
Prelude> a
:1: Variable not in scope: `a'
Prelude> b
:1: Variable not in scope: `b'
Prelude>
What does "let a + b = 3" mean
Hello,
Does anybody know how you hyperlink your Haddock to functions
whose name ends with a prime. e.g. foldl'
I've tried..
'foldl\''
and
'foldl''
But neither works. In each case I get a link to foldl (unprimed
version) followed by an isolated ' character.
This is with Haddock v
Dear Haskellers,
There is now a new version of the Haskell development support for the
Eclipse IDE.
The project has been moved to Sourceforge, and the new project website is at
http://eclipsefp.sourceforge.net .
The new version requires Eclipse 3.0. Installation is done using the
built-in update
