Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2) display result of the analysis (pie charts, histograms, plots)
> If you don't need to interact with the display, the simplest solution
> is to generate graphics files. Personally, I would use PostScript
I would output to Gnuplot...
> as I'm reas
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:26:51AM -0400, Michael Manti wrote:
> I recognize that I'm far out of my depth here--both in Haskell and in
> mathematics--but I'll ask anyway. In what ways are dependent types
> (http://haskell.org/hawiki/FunDeps,
> http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~mpj/pubs/fundeps.html) insuffic
These awful graphic problems are immortal...
Glynn Clements comments my suggestion about using PostScript as
the output interface
Well, more than often proposing another *language* to process raw data
might be an overkill.
I wasn't proposing *processing* the data in PostScr
A bit off topic, but a haskell charting/graphic library designer would
be wise to check out the highly successful python equivelant, pychart.
It seems as though a library equivelant in features to pychart is
exactly what the original poster is looking for.
David
__
Ketil Malde wrote:
> >> 2) display result of the analysis (pie charts, histograms, plots)
>
> > If you don't need to interact with the display, the simplest solution
> > is to generate graphics files. Personally, I would use PostScript
>
> I would output to Gnuplot...
>
> > as I'm reasonably
