You must call ./configure script with
--enable-dotnet option and rebuild GHC.
Cheers,
Krasimir
--- Vincenzo aka Nick Name
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 September 2004 08:44, Krasimir
> Angelov wrote:
> > The Sigbjorn Finne's .NET integration is also
> ported
> > to GHC but I
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 08:44, Krasimir Angelov wrote:
> The Sigbjorn Finne's .NET integration is also ported
> to GHC but I am not sure whether it is efficient
> enough. The bridge uses reflection to call .NET
> methods and each time when the method is called it is
> located by its name.
W
Hello,
I am a bit confused about command stacks. I tried to run the following
code in ghc:
mshowA :: (Arrow a, Show b) => a (b, String) String
mshowA = proc (x,s) -> returnA -< s ++ show x ++ s
f :: Arrow a => a Int String
f = proc x -> do a <- (mshowA -< x) "***"
returnA -< a
Greetings [and apologies if you get multiple copies]:
The fifth ACL2 Workshop will be held November 18-19, 2004, in Austin Texas,
USA, in conjunction with (and immediately following) FMCAD. We invite users
of ACL2, users of other theorem provers, and persons interested in the
applications of theo
Haskell and ML certainly have advantages over Java and C#. But it's important to
realise firstly that they have disadvantages too, and secondly that the imperative/OO
languages are evolving fast. When the mainstream was only C/C++, the most important
advantage of functional languages was garbage
At 20:18 14/09/04 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meanwhile I am quite convinced that Haskell might not only be the right
choice for a prototype, but also for the "real thing". But inevitably some
people around here are scared about about the risks of using a
non-mainstream programming language, an
I regard myself as a practical "in the trenches" kind of programmer, not an
academic researcher, (though I seem to work in the murky no-man's-land
between research and commercial exploitation, and have tended to operate at
the "bleeding edge" for my commercial work). I see real value in Haskell
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Can Haskell code be integrated with .NET, in case
> the department
> should decide to base more of its software on this
> platform? (I have found
> Sigbjorn Finne's integration of Hugs with .NET, but
> I would prefer the
> native-code compilation of GHC. I remem
