On Tuesday 26 April 2005 11:15, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
> > Does that mean my program will be GPL if I compile it with jhc?
>
> No; cf. gcc.
Fr details see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGPLToolsForNF
Ben
Thanks for the detailed explanation that helped clearing up the smog in
my head. I reckoned that once more the MR was to blame, at least for
part of it.
in particular, when I compare with the single parameter case:
class C a where fc :: a -> a -> ()
c1 x = let p = fc x in ()
c2 x = let p y
International Conference on Logic Programming
Doctoral Consortium
Sitges (Barcelona), Spain
October 2-5, 2005
http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~epontell/DC2005
---
The ICLP Doctoral Consortium (DC)
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
>
> Does that mean my program will be GPL if I compile it with jhc?
No; cf. gcc.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
__
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John Meacham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Very interesting! What license uses jhc? The COPYING file seems to be empty.
>
> It is under the GPL.
Does that mean my program will be GPL if I compile it with jhc?
--
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
___
