Bugs item #1197552, was opened at 2005-05-08 07:16
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by simonmar
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1197552group_id=8032
Category: Runtime System
Group: 6.4
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Bugs item #1097471, was opened at 2005-01-06 20:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonmar
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1097471group_id=8032
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Hi,
Hmm, have the new xlib bindings been tested? For instance, when I run
the following program:
module Main where
import Graphics.X11.Xlib
import Graphics.X11.Xlib.Display
main :: IO ()
main = do
display - openDisplay
Bugs item #1198393, was opened at 2005-05-09 09:21
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1198393group_id=8032
Category: Profiling
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #1198393, was opened at 2005-05-09 09:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1198393group_id=8032
Category: Profiling
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Hi,
I also have (a rather large) program (not included) that segfaults when
compiled with profiling. I use the ghc-6.4 linux binary distribution
from the web.
It is not even necessary to call the program with +RTS -p -RTS. There is
no problem with ghc-6.2.2, except that the old version uses its
Bugs item #1097471, was opened at 2005-01-07 05:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juhp
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1097471group_id=8032
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted
Bugs item #1198673, was opened at 2005-05-10 09:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juhp
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1198673group_id=8032
Category: libraries (other)
Group: 6.4
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #1198673, was opened at 2005-05-10 09:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juhp
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1198673group_id=8032
Category: Compiler
Group: 6.4
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #1198765, was opened at 2005-05-10 13:28
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1198765group_id=8032
Category: Compiler
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution:
Feature Requests item #1097471, was opened at 2005-01-07 05:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juhp
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=358032aid=1097471group_id=8032
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted
Feature Requests item #1084122, was opened at 2004-12-13 10:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juhp
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=358032aid=1084122group_id=8032
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By:
robert dockins addresses this to -
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to learn Haskell.
...
At this point I decide that I'll teach people Python instead of
Haskell. I don't particularly like Python, but hey, it works.
Your choice, of course.
I'll say more. You may buy to your kids
Andrew Cheadle wrote:
:-p ok,ok, lots of people (but will they really continue to - we
dropped it from our labs long ago). Having said that, how many
people don't have access to a Windoze or Linux
I don't have access to Win or Linux. But that's besides the point. I
think it's reasonable to expect
Well Robert Dockins gave you an excellent explanation.
You're just unlucky at the moment with 6.4. 6.2.2 is excellent -
for various reasons I've had to stick with it for completion of some
of my research.
Having the compiler able to compile itself, yes. Making that the only
way to compile it,
robert dockins wrote:
Perhaps. Nonetheless it is common practice for compilers to be written
in the target language and to be compiled via bootstrapping. Ever take
a look at the GCC sources? You guessed it: C.
Please don't confuse the compiler being written in the target language
with the
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 09:54 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to learn Haskell.
Some software isn't user friendly. But I think that a compiler requiring
itself to compile is actively user hostile. I've spent over a week
trying to get GHC to work on my Solaris
Duncan Coutts wrote:
This route is going to be your best bet. Find any binary version of ghc
that works on your Solaris and then from there you've broken the
GHC-GHC dep cycle.
Okay. Is there a version that's more likely to work than others? Or
should I try them sequentially from most recent,
On 10 April 2005 14:20, I wrote:
Is someone aware of any efforts to port the GHC to GNU/Hurd?
If not, I'd like to give that a try.
I succeeded. :-)
I did the bootstrap using a ghc-6-4-branch checkout, dated
20050422T204743Z.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:44:18AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
2005-05-09T16:09:16 Daniel Carrera:
I think it should be if you want Haskell to grow in acceptance.
The first barrier that new potential users hit is the one that
causes most people to give up and move on to a different project.
That first barrier should be made as low as possible.
This is a
I think it should be if you want Haskell to grow in acceptance. The first
barrier that new potential users hit is the one that causes most people to
give up and move on to a different project. That first barrier should be
made as low as possible.
Without commenting on any of the other points
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 21:26 -0400, Mark Brooks wrote:
I say this because I have been evaluating
Haskell for use in my senior project. I need a stable and usable graphics
toolkit for the project. While graphics toolkits for Haskell do exist, they
are oftentimes either translations of other
On May 9, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Bennett Todd wrote:
2005-05-09T16:09:16 Daniel Carrera:
I think it should be if you want Haskell to grow in acceptance.
The first barrier that new potential users hit is the one that
causes most people to give up and move on to a different project.
That first barrier
I seem to recall some time ago the Simons asked on one of these lists
about uses people might have for GHC-as-library. It sounded really neat
to me, and I just kind of wonder if there is any motion on that front.
I'm thinking about hacking up a system to extract proof obligations into
Coq
On 07 May 2005 11:59, Dominic Steinitz wrote:
Does anyone know why these are in the IO monad? Aren't they pure
functions converting between dotted-decimal strings and a 32-bit
network byte ordered binary value?
Dominic.
On 06 May 2005 18:33, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On 5/6/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(d) I hoped that something like grafting would provide a more
general solution.
Grafting sounds like a very nice solution just from the name, but I
don't recall hearing of it before. Where
On 5/9/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06 May 2005 18:33, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On 5/6/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(d) I hoped that something like grafting would provide a more
general solution.
Grafting sounds like a very nice solution just from the
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/network/Network.So
cket.html#v%3Ainet_addr
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/network/Network.So
cket.html#v%3Ainet_ntoa
What is with this wrapping? Sorry to cross-post this, but I couldn't
figure out what to cut
Dominic Steinitz writes:
inet_addr' :: (Octet,Octet,Octet,Octet) - HostAddress
inet_ntoa' :: HostAddress - (Octet,Octet,Octet,Octet)
I see Peter Simons has already written something:
http://cryp.to/hsdns/docs/Network.IP.Address.html#v%3Aha2tpl
As usual, I didn't write as much as I
Peter Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Considering that as of today _none_ of these variations has the slightest
idea what IPv6 is, it might be worth trying to unify that.
Einar Karttunen's network-alt supports IPv6, datagram, and more:
http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/ekarttun/network-alt/
--
It
Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I don't follow this
mailing list as closely as I follow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cabal bugs
should be reported there or CC'd to me...
Peter Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've run into a problem when trying to build a package with
Cabal using a
Daniel Fischer wrote:
If the algorithm - including dt - is prescribed, fine, but I wonder what sort
of deviation physicists would consider acceptable.
For dt = 0.01, k = 2000 we have a relative error of about 2*10^(-5), is that
within accepted bounds or not? (Any physicists hang about here?)
At 13:08 07/05/05 -0400, David Roundy wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:40:55PM -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
In your opinion, do you think Haskell is appropriate for someone with
zero math background? I can't imagine how I'd explain something like
currying to someone who doesn't know math.
I'd
On May 9, 2005, at 8:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all.
Quoting Bo Herlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Great, why not put these together in a first attempt of making a
standard library?
As promised, here's the first attempt:
darcs get http://andrew.bromage.org/darcs/numbertheory/
How about
G'day all.
Quoting Jan-Willem Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How about one that's actually H98? The types here aren't *that*
fiddly... :-)
Well, part of what I was doing was experimenting with what a library like
this should look like, even more than what it should do. For some reason,
I kind
35 matches
Mail list logo
