Hello Wolfgang,
Saturday, July 09, 2005, 7:01:06 PM, you wrote:
>> > As part of my diploma thesis, I'm working on a small collection of modules
>> > which provides safe I/O interleaving. The key point is to split the state
>> > of the world since I/O on different parts of the world can be interl
Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2005 08:31 schrieb Bulat Ziganshin:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> Friday, July 08, 2005, 11:55:48 PM, you wrote:
>
> > As part of my diploma thesis, I'm working on a small collection of modules
> > which provides safe I/O interleaving. The key point is to split the state
> > of the wor
Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2005 15:25 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:55:48PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > As part of my diploma thesis, I'm working on a small collection of
> > modules which provides safe I/O interleaving. The key point is to split
> > the state of the world since I/O
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:55:48PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> As part of my diploma thesis, I'm working on a small collection of modules
> which provides safe I/O interleaving. The key point is to split the state of
> the world since I/O on different parts of the world can be interleaved
Hello Wolfgang,
Friday, July 08, 2005, 11:55:48 PM, you wrote:
WJ> As part of my diploma thesis, I'm working on a small collection of modules
WJ> which provides safe I/O interleaving. The key point is to split the state
of
WJ> the world since I/O on different parts of the world can be interle
Hello Andrew,
Friday, July 08, 2005, 8:43:02 PM, you wrote:
AP> It is one thing to embrace lazy evaluation order, and another to embrace
AP> lazy IO (implemented using unsafeInterleaveIO). As a relative newcomer
AP> to Haskell, I got the impression that the "interact" style was always a
AP> hack,
