Tomasz Zielonka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Nice, thanks! BTW, could you also share the configuration you use to
> split e-mails into folders? Do you use procmail for this?
I use maildrop, here is part of my .mailfilter:
if ( /^X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ || /^X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Frederik,
> To do "automatic lifting" you need to do a (higher-order) effect analysis,
> then make sure the
> compiler doesn't rearrange applications which have conflicting effects.
Hrm, I disagree. I don't think this is what I was advocating in my
message.
What I'm advocating is a reasonably
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 12:46:42PM -0700, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi!
> After some weeks of squinting, I've ended up settling with the
> following partial solution in my configuration files (I use Mutt):
>
> set strict_threads=yes
> folder-hook folders/haskell set strict_threads=no
> fol
Frederik Eaton wrote:
I want the type system to be able to do "automatic lifting" of monads,
i.e., since [] is a monad, I should be able to write the following:
[1,2]+[3,4]
and have it interpreted as "do {a<-[1,2]; b<-[3,4]; return (a+b)}".
print ("a: " ++ readLn ++ "\nb: " ++ readLn)
two
Hi,
Sean's comment (yeah, it was like a billion years ago, just catching
up) is something that I've often thought myself.
I want the type system to be able to do "automatic lifting" of monads,
i.e., since [] is a monad, I should be able to write the following:
[1,2]+[3,4]
and have it interpret
Hi all,
I've been trying for some time to get threading to work properly on
this mailing list. The problem is that I don't want to thread by
subject in all of my folders, because then messages with short
subjects like "hi", "hey", etc., in my personal folders will end up
together. However, threadi
