Re: [Haskell] Read Instances for Data.Map and Data.Set

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:20:10PM +0200, Georg Martius wrote: > Hi folks, > > I was really annoyed by the fact that for Data.Map and Data.Set are no Read > instances declared, but Show instances are! I believe there should be some > kind of unwritten rule that in the standart lib the Show and R

[Haskell] Read Instances for Data.Map and Data.Set

Hi folks, I was really annoyed by the fact that for Data.Map and Data.Set are no Read instances declared, but Show instances are! I believe there should be some kind of unwritten rule that in the standart lib the Show and Read instances come pairwise and are fully compatible. Anyway since the

[Haskell] CFP: CICLing-2006 -- Computational Linguistics, Springer LNCS, February, Mexico -- one week reminder

CICLing-2006 7th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics February 19-25, 2006 Mexico City, Mexico Endorsed by the ACL www.CICLing.org/2006 PUBLICATION: LNCS: Springer

RE: [Haskell] Excessive sharing and GHC

| > >I was thinking it would be nice if one could put a pragma on CAFs that | > >basically made ghc treat them as WHNF so it would float them inward as | > >far as possible including inside lambdas. in particular, constant | > >strings that are created (cheaply) from efficient internal | > >represe