Re: [Haskell] Haskell Weekly News: March 13, 2006

2006-03-17 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
sebastian.sylvan: > The ICFP boasting could be moved elsewhere (perhaps put the quote at > the very top under the logo), the rest of the items seem "regular" > enough to be popped off the news list just like any other HWN-type > news. > The only regularly occuring news that really need to stick aro

Re: [Haskell] Re: Haskell Digest, Vol 31, Issue 15

2006-03-17 Thread Udo Stenzel
minh thu wrote: > to be clear, the data structure i'm thinking of is the "half edge" or > "winged edge" this would involve a cyclic structure, and you want to update that. I don't think there's a purely functional way to implement that, and if there is, it wouldn't allow O(1) modifications. So i

Re: [Haskell] dynamic arrays

2006-03-17 Thread minh thu
2006/3/17, minh thu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2006/3/17, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello Jared, > > > > Thursday, March 16, 2006, 11:35:24 PM, you wrote: > > > > JU> General question to the list: > > JU> (Q) Are there any data structures in Haskell similar to C++/STL > > JU> vectors or

Re: [Haskell] dynamic arrays

2006-03-17 Thread minh thu
2006/3/17, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello Jared, > > Thursday, March 16, 2006, 11:35:24 PM, you wrote: > > JU> General question to the list: > JU> (Q) Are there any data structures in Haskell similar to C++/STL > JU> vectors or C# generic Lists (i.e. strongly typed ArrayLists, e.g. >

[Haskell] dynamic arrays

2006-03-17 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Jared, Thursday, March 16, 2006, 11:35:24 PM, you wrote: JU> General question to the list: JU> (Q) Are there any data structures in Haskell similar to C++/STL JU> vectors or C# generic Lists (i.e. strongly typed ArrayLists, e.g. JU> List)? These data structures grow automatically as you ad

Re: [Haskell] Haskell Weekly News: March 13, 2006

2006-03-17 Thread Sebastian Sylvan
On 3/17/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebastian.sylvan: > > On 3/17/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > rjmh: > > > > >With a view to this I started collecting just the announcements on a > > > > >`feed' here: > > > > > http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~don

Re: [Haskell] Haskell Weekly News: March 13, 2006

2006-03-17 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
sebastian.sylvan: > On 3/17/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > rjmh: > > > >With a view to this I started collecting just the announcements on a > > > >`feed' here: > > > > http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/code/hwn/announce.html > > > > > > > >These should serve as a basis fo

Re: [Haskell] Haskell Weekly News: March 13, 2006

2006-03-17 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
antti-juhani: > Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > > Well, there is a way -- it's fairly easy with the right regex -- but > > is it really ambiguous? Do people find it confusing? What do other sites do? > > Yes, it's annoying (it isn't ambigous right now, but it will be again > early next month). Eith

Re: [Haskell] Haskell Weekly News: March 13, 2006

2006-03-17 Thread Sebastian Sylvan
On 3/17/06, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > rjmh: > > >With a view to this I started collecting just the announcements on a > > >`feed' here: > > > http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/code/hwn/announce.html > > > > > >These should serve as a basis for the content, I think. > > > >

Re: [Haskell] Haskell Weekly News: March 13, 2006

2006-03-17 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > Well, there is a way -- it's fairly easy with the right regex -- but > is it really ambiguous? Do people find it confusing? What do other sites do? Yes, it's annoying (it isn't ambigous right now, but it will be again early next month). Either use an inherently unamb

Re: [Haskell] Re: Haskell Weekly News: March 13, 2006

2006-03-17 Thread Jon Fairbairn
On 2006-03-17 at 06:58GMT Aaron Denney wrote: > On 2006-03-17, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, there is a way -- it's fairly easy with the right regex -- but > > is it really ambiguous? Do people find it confusing? What do other sites do? > > Why not the ISO standard YYY