On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
In the recent discussion on "Haskell as a disruptive technology" I
predicted that MS would incorporate functional programming into its
languages.
MS does this already, for quite some time. The product is called ...
Excel.
Any spreadsheet
In the recent discussion on "Haskell as a disruptive technology" I
predicted that MS would incorporate functional programming into its
languages.
See here for details.
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1406
Paul.
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@h
Hi,
Why not just call it, say, Test.QuickCheck2?
I think module names should reflect only their functionality. I don't
see how "External" or "Contrib" or "Chalmers" would say anything
useful about the functionality of the modules.
A while ago I sent a proposal for "package mounting", which I thi
+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->+*->
DEADLINE-EXTENSION-DEADLINE-EXTENSION-DEADLINE-EXTENSION-DEADLINE-EXTENSION
Workshop on Mathematically Structured Functional Programming
http://cs.ioc.ee/mpc-amast06/msfp/
New deadlin
Dear all,
For the past couple of years, I have been quietly hacking on a brand new
version of QuickCheck with lots of cool features. I have been
distributing copies to some friends, but have not released any official
package.
Now, after lots of peer pressure, the time has come that I want to
rel
