On 5/30/06, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
my comments to your README:
(...)
Bulat, thanks for your suggestions/comments! I've turned most of your
points into entries/paragraphs on HsJudy/TODO =)
--
Caio Marcelo
___
Haskell mailing list
Fellow Haskellers,
I am pleased to announce the simultaneous release of Shellac 0.3 and Lambda
Shell 0.3. Because I actually never got around to announcing the 0.2
releases, the following change lists are compared to versions 0.1.
Shellac is a library for creating read-eval-print style shells.
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:23:51PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Duncan Coutts wrote:
> >I know some people take issue with using the LGPL for Haskell libraries
> >because of the linking problems. While it's easy to swap over a LGPL
> >C .so module it's rather harder for Haskell since there's no sta
Duncan Coutts wrote:
I know some people take issue with using the LGPL for Haskell libraries
because of the linking problems. While it's easy to swap over a LGPL
C .so module it's rather harder for Haskell since there's no stable ABI.
However this is easy to overcome by adding an explicit excepti
On May 30, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Brian Hulley wrote:
Well the problem with LGPL afaiu is that if you statically link
your code to it your are required to make your own source code
available.
You could be confusing LGPL with GPL, I think. Or am I confused?
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wager
Brian Hulley wrote:
> Malcolm Wallace wrote:
>> "Brian Hulley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If what you really mean by "open source" is the ability to take code
>> and into make non-open modifications to it (as BSD permits), then
>> that is far more demanding than what most people mean by the ter
Malcolm Wallace wrote:
"Brian Hulley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://judy.sf.net
I wonder if the authors of the library could be persuaded to make it
available under an Open Source license, because currently it is under
the very limiting restrictions imposed by LGPL...
You have a very n
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 14:16 +0100, Brian Hulley wrote:
> Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> > the Judy library itself:
> > http://judy.sf.net
> > http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/judy/Judy-1.0.3.tar.gz
>
> I wonder if the authors of the library could be persuaded to make it
> available under an O
"Brian Hulley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://judy.sf.net
>
> I wonder if the authors of the library could be persuaded to make it
> available under an Open Source license, because currently it is under
> the very limiting restrictions imposed by LGPL...
You have a very non-standard def
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
the Judy library itself:
http://judy.sf.net
http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/judy/Judy-1.0.3.tar.gz
I wonder if the authors of the library could be persuaded to make it
available under an Open Source license, because currently it is under the
very limiting res
Hello Caio,
Tuesday, May 30, 2006, 5:29:46 AM, you wrote:
> I'm Caio Marcelo and my project for this Summer of Code is "Fast
> Mutable Collection Types for Haskell", I'll be implementing a lot of
> APIs for data collections (like Map and Arrays) using Judy library as
> backend.
my comments to yo
11 matches
Mail list logo
