> Furthermore, can we move this thread from the Haskell mailing list
> (which should not have heavy traffic) to either Haskell-Café, or
> the libraries list?
Sure, moving to haskell-cafe.
Frederik
--
http://ofb.net/~frederik/
___
Haskell mailing list
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:21:06PM +0300, Einar Karttunen wrote:
> On 07.08 13:16, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > > How would this work together with the FFI?
> >
> > It wouldn't, at least I wouldn't care if it didn't.
>
> Suddenly breaking libraries that happen to use FFI behind your
> back does not
On 07.08 13:16, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > How would this work together with the FFI?
>
> It wouldn't, at least I wouldn't care if it didn't.
>
Suddenly breaking libraries that happen to use FFI behind your
back does not seem like a good conservative extension.
I think we should move the discussi
Hi Simon,
It is good that you support thread-local variables.
I have initialized a wiki page:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Thread_local_storage
The main difference between my and your proposals, as I see it, is
that your proposal is based on "keys" which can be used for other
things.
I think
Hello Ki,
Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 6:34:51 AM, you wrote:
> Unfortunately seq and the strict data declaration is not helpful in general.
> They are only helpful on base values such as Int or Bool.
> What they do is just making sure that it is not a thunk.
> That is if it was a list it would just
