One thing jumped out at me from the status report: everything was "add",
which reminded me of many old languages designed by accretion.
Are the new facilities so perfectly orthogonal as not to subsume anything
that was already there? Are none of them simply relaxations of previous
limitatations?
Greetings,
As announced at the Haskell Workshop, the Haskell Prime process is
running another committee selection round. We are specifically
looking for people to write sections of the Haskell Report for the
"definitely in" and "probably in" proposals, as described in:
http://hackage.haskell.org
Ravi Nanavati has very helpfully put together a status report for the
Haskell Prime process. Please see this link, or read the pasted text
below:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/Status'
peace,
isaac
Summary:
Since the Haskell Workshop last year, the Haskell community has
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:20:36PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> As it happens I was working on getting GHC to use cabal to build base
> et al on the plane the other day, and I had a brief look at this.
See my comment in
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/710
for the results of my long
