[Haskell] Re: Haskell Packages 6.6?

2006-10-03 Thread Isaac Jones
I'd like to trim the followup to cabal-devel@ or libraries@ so we don't cross-post to all lists. Lemmih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10/4/06, Isaac Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello good Haskell Hackers. >> >> We're pretty well along the way to getting cabal-install and friends >> wor

[Haskell] Re: Haskell Packages 6.6?

2006-10-03 Thread Lemmih
On 10/4/06, Isaac Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello good Haskell Hackers. We're pretty well along the way to getting cabal-install and friends working nicely. We've got almost 30 packages in the database. I added a few more. We have 32 now. Let's imagine something that would be awesome

[Haskell] Summer of Code Summit and Haskell

2006-10-03 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
Hey all, The Google Summer of Code is now wrapping up, and Haskell.org's projects have been quite successful. The full details will available soon in a report we're preparing (next week some time), though quite likely you have already seen the various student projects previously announced to the c

Re: [Haskell] Evil code

2006-10-03 Thread Albert Lai
Thomas Davie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The evil code and CPSness were actually intended to be completely > separate entities. I needed (and to a lesser extent now still need), > examples that are (a) very higher order, and (b) evil and hard to > understand the runtime behaviour of. Generally

[Haskell] Haskell Packages 6.6?

2006-10-03 Thread Isaac Jones
Hello good Haskell Hackers. We're pretty well along the way to getting cabal-install and friends working nicely. We've got almost 30 packages in the database. Let's imagine something that would be awesome. A set of Haskell packages which are all known to work together with a particular version

Re: [Haskell] Evil code

2006-10-03 Thread Thomas Davie
On 3 Oct 2006, at 23:09, Tony Morris wrote: [Tangent] Please excuse my ignorance, but it seems there is assumption of general acceptance that CPS incorporates "Evil code". Are you able to support this or refer to a document that does? Thanks for any pointers. Tony Morris http://tmorris.net/

Re: [Haskell] Evil code

2006-10-03 Thread Tony Morris
[Tangent] Please excuse my ignorance, but it seems there is assumption of general acceptance that CPS incorporates "Evil code". Are you able to support this or refer to a document that does? Thanks for any pointers. Tony Morris http://tmorris.net/ Thomas Davie wrote: > Hello list, > I am in t

[Haskell] Re: Replacing and improving pattern guards with PMC syntax

2006-10-03 Thread apfelmus
I see that <= is already used... Let's take <~ (tilde) instead. A "pseudo-sugared" version in plain Haskell for f (Right (Right p)) = p f (Left p) = p f p = p that is f p = fromJust $ | Right q <~ p | Right r <~ q = r | Left q <~ p = q

[Haskell] Re: Haskell Weekly News: September 27, 2006

2006-10-03 Thread Cyril Schmidt
That's really good news. Big thank-you to the CUFP committee! Having seen the proceedings of Haskell Workshop 1995 published in 2006, I was prepared to wait much longer ;-) Cheers, Cyril The slides will be available at http://www.galois.com/cufp very soon (maybe even today). I don't have How

Re: [Haskell] Haskell training course?

2006-10-03 Thread Jeremy Gibbons
Hello, Wim. What kind of thing do you have in mind? I teach a one-week course on Functional Programming (using Haskell, and aimed at practical application) as part of the part-time professional Software Engineering Programme at Oxford. It can be taken on a standalone basis, or as credit tow

[Haskell] Re: Replacing and improving pattern guards with PMC syntax

2006-10-03 Thread apfelmus
> The > problem is not that there is syntactic sugar for pattern matching, > but that this isn't sugar coating at all - there is functionality hidden > in there that cannot be provided by the remainder of the language. > > In other words, pattern matching and associated "sugar" become > part of Ha

[Haskell] Re: Common library for generic programming

2006-10-03 Thread apfelmus
> If you want to get involved (or just want to see the discussion), you > can subscribe to the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED], see > > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/generics > > -- Johan Jeuring and Andres Loeh Can you add the mailing list to GMANE? ___

[Haskell] CfP: PAPP 2007

2006-10-03 Thread grelck
Please, accept our apologies if you receive multiple copies. = Fourth International Workshop on Practical Aspects of High-level Parallel Programming (PAPP 2007) part of The International Conference on Computational Science May 27-30, 2007, University of Beij

[Haskell] Haskell training course?

2006-10-03 Thread Wim Vanderbauwhede
Hello list,Does anyone know of a good Haskell training course in the UK?TIA,Wiim-- If it's pointless, what's the point?If there is a point to it, what's the point?(Tibor Fischer, "The Thought Gang") ___ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.

[Haskell] Evil code

2006-10-03 Thread Thomas Davie
Hello list, I am in the process of testing a debugger, and need some examples to throw at it. It's based on hat, so the normal rules about nothing that uses glasgow extensions or ffi apply. But I'm hitting a bit of a wall. Do any of you have some examples of nasty uses of higher order

[Haskell] Haskell Weekly News: October 03, 2006

2006-10-03 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
--- Haskell Weekly News http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/HWN Issue 43 - October 03, 2006 --- Welcome to issue 43 of HWN, a weekly newsletter covering de