> Also, the SML version uses Vectors, "polymorphic vectors, immutable
> sequences with constant-time access". I wonder how immutable these are.
> I suspect that changing elements does updates in place with history
> tracking?
SML vectors in the standard basis library are truly immutable, and no
hi
Andrzej Jaworski wrote:
> Nevertheless my point is still valid: when on compiler side the heap is
> stretched and on program side you need Ockham's Razor in action Haskell
> chokes. I hoped at least to stimulate interest in repeating GP experiment
> with latest GHC version. This could make a hot p
> it is more often than not the case that the reason for this is not that Y
is
> faster than X, but that one has learned a lot about the problem when
> implementing in X. So in general you see an improvement even when X == Y,
To be honest I suspect that in ADP case it is exactly that, particularly
I think that we should follow the advice of Kristen Chevalier, and
redirect this discussion to haskell-cafe
Fawzi
On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Sven Panne wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 13:44, Andrzej Jaworski wrote:
I have learned logic from much deeper sources;-)
My statement was:
Guys
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 13:44, Andrzej Jaworski wrote:
> I have learned logic from much deeper sources;-)
> My statement was:
> Guys started in Haskell and got to conclusion that for performance reasons
> it is better to move to C. The guys know what they are doing.
>
> I hope that helps;-)
H
I have learned logic from much deeper sources;-)
My statement was:
Guys started in Haskell and got to conclusion that for performance reasons
it is better to move to C. The guys know what they are doing.
I hope that helps;-)
___
Haskell mailing list
duncan.coutts:
> On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:57 -0800, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
>
> > Haskell, now:
> > * Very much slower than C
> > * Very much easier to use than C
> > * Very easy to interface with C
> >
> > So I think we should do the same. It even shows in the Shootout - the
> > programs that a
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 02:13, Andrzej Jaworski wrote:
> > writing a real compiler for that language made sense, and also the
> > choice of c as language for it, but I think that it would have been
> > possible to write it in haskell without a big performance hit.
>
> ADP was conceived in Haske
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:57 -0800, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> Haskell, now:
> * Very much slower than C
> * Very much easier to use than C
> * Very easy to interface with C
>
> So I think we should do the same. It even shows in the Shootout - the
> programs that are simultaneously fastest and cle
