>Or maybe we have come to the point where Haskell's lack of a 'real' module
>system, like e.g. in SML, actually starts to hurt? Can associated types
>come to the rescue?
The organic growth of Haskell resulted in many compromises to the core
design. As a result Haskell inherits inadequate module sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
> I think the LANGUAGE pragma is better than the OPTIONS_GHC pragma but I
> am relatively indifferent on that issue. My only point is that module
> authors should put this information in the module source rather than in
> t
