On 2008 Jul 11, at 11:33, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Quite true. Any objections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Google suggests that about 1 in 50 web pages spell "beginner" wrong,
using only one "n". Given that many Haskeller's are not native
speakers, could we perhaps pick something that is easier to spell
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Peter Verswyvelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "beginner" sounds so humble...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@haskell.org (for the experts)
*chuckle*
Sorry, I just had to reply.
-w
___
Haskell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"beginner" sounds so humble...
Cheers,
Peter Verswyvelen
www.anygma.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Neil Mitchell
> Sent: vrijdag 11 juli 2008 17:33
> To: Simon Marlow
> Cc: Bayley, Alistair; haskell@haskell.o
> I participate in various lists and various forums. That Haskell uses
> lists has crippled my participation here; I am quite sure I am not
> alone. Nabble and the like do not substitute for real forum software.
Funny, it's the first time I hear the argument in this direction.
The only forums I
On Jul11, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Quite true. Any objections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? I think the plural conveys more of a
sense of community than the singular.
-Dan
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.has
Hi
> Quite true. Any objections to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Google suggests that about 1 in 50 web pages spell "beginner" wrong,
using only one "n". Given that many Haskeller's are not native
speakers, could we perhaps pick something that is easier to spell
correctly?
Thanks
Neil
___
Bayley, Alistair wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin L.Russell
The only issue is the name of the new list, though: it would seem a
better idea to keep the name mnemonic and short, with the suffix
following "Haskell-" within three or four characters.
Jonathan Cast wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 15:04 +0100, Sittampalam, Ganesh wrote:
Dave Bayer wrote:
I participate in various lists and
various forums. That Haskell uses
lists has crippled my participation
here; I am quite sure I am not alone.
Nabble and the like do not substitute
for real f
On 2008 Jul 11, at 9:54, Jonathan Cast wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 08:47 -0400, Chad Wilson wrote:
From previous experience with this sort of thing (the expansion of
usage for a list(s)), I am thinking you guys have entered a territory
better served by a forum. One subscription gets you acc
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 15:04 +0100, Sittampalam, Ganesh wrote:
> Dave Bayer wrote:
>
> > I participate in various lists and
> > various forums. That Haskell uses
> > lists has crippled my participation
> > here; I am quite sure I am not alone.
> > Nabble and the like do not substitute
> > for re
Dave Bayer wrote:
> I participate in various lists and
> various forums. That Haskell uses
> lists has crippled my participation
> here; I am quite sure I am not alone.
> Nabble and the like do not substitute
> for real forum software.
I'm sure you're not alone, but I'm equally sure that there
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 08:47 -0400, Chad Wilson wrote:
> >From previous experience with this sort of thing (the expansion of
> usage for a list(s)), I am thinking you guys have entered a territory
> better served by a forum. One subscription gets you access to the
> cafe, announcements, n00b sectio
2008/7/11 Dave Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jul 11, 2008, at 5:47 AM, Chad Wilson wrote:
>
>> From previous experience with this sort of thing (the expansion of
>> usage for a list(s)), I am thinking you guys have entered a territory
>> better served by a forum. One subscription gets you access
On Jul 11, 2008, at 5:47 AM, Chad Wilson wrote:
From previous experience with this sort of thing (the expansion of
usage for a list(s)), I am thinking you guys have entered a territory
better served by a forum. One subscription gets you access to the
cafe, announcements, n00b section, teachers,
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin L.Russell
>
> The only issue is the name of the new list, though: it would seem a
> better idea to keep the name mnemonic and short, with the suffix
> following "Haskell-" within three or four characters. Typing
> "[EMA
>From previous experience with this sort of thing (the expansion of
usage for a list(s)), I am thinking you guys have entered a territory
better served by a forum. One subscription gets you access to the
cafe, announcements, n00b section, teachers, core functions, etc.
While a forum lacks the conv
Please allow me to thank everybody for their feedback.
So far, including the three private messages I have received, there
have been the following responses on creating a new mailing list for
Haskell:
Haskell-Beginner (or Haskell-Edu for beginners):
8 votes
Haskell-Edu (for teaching):
2 vote
Changes since 0.8.1 (I put 0.8.2 up on hackage with an error in Setup.hs,
so it's been skipped):
- ODBC support: datetime marshalling is improved. For bind parameters
this uses the timestamp struct for most back-ends, but String for
MS SQL Server because populating the timestamp struct alwa
[third attempt to avoid being blocked with: "Message has a suspicious
header":-(]
it's not obvious to me that both of those needs should be served by a
single list. I believe it's important that the mailing lists served
by haskell.org should have clear non-overlapping topics.
For those case
19 matches
Mail list logo
