On Wednesday 04 March 2009 9:12:20 pm o...@okmij.org wrote:
> We demonstrate how lazy IO breaks referential transparency. A pure
> function of the type Int->Int->Int gives different integers depending
> on the order of evaluation of its arguments. Our Haskell98 code uses
> nothing but the standard
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:22 -0800, Jonathan Cast wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:12 -0800, o...@okmij.org wrote:
> >
> > We demonstrate how lazy IO breaks referential transparency. A pure
> > function of the type Int->Int->Int gives different integers depending
> > on the order of evaluation of
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:12 -0800, o...@okmij.org wrote:
>
> We demonstrate how lazy IO breaks referential transparency. A pure
> function of the type Int->Int->Int gives different integers depending
> on the order of evaluation of its arguments. Our Haskell98 code uses
> nothing but the standard
We demonstrate how lazy IO breaks referential transparency. A pure
function of the type Int->Int->Int gives different integers depending
on the order of evaluation of its arguments. Our Haskell98 code uses
nothing but the standard input. We conclude that extolling the purity
of Haskell and adve
Happstack 0.2 has been released; it is available on Hackage. A lot of
community effort has gone into it!
For details, please see this post:
http://blog.happstack.com/2009/03/04/happstack-02-released
Regards,
Matthew Elder
--
Need somewhere to put your code? http://patch-tag.com
Want to build a
