Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: Haskell 2010 Report (final)

2010-07-08 Thread John Meacham
Ack, I just noticed that IntPtr,IntMax, and WordPtr and WordMax were left out of the report. These are fairly vital for writing portable FFI code. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ - http://notanumber.net/ ___ Haskell mailing list Haske

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: Haskell 2010 Report (final)

2010-07-08 Thread Sven Moritz Hallberg
> The library situation is more complicated, there is tension between > haskell 98, haskell 2010, and supporting code in the wild, which often > assumes some specific version of ghc's base, which doesn't quite conform > to either. My current thinking is to give up supporting base directly as > a cl

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: Haskell 2010 Report (final)

2010-07-08 Thread John Meacham
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 09:48:20PM +0300, Roman Cheplyaka wrote: > Greetings! Now, can different compiler/interpreter authors make > statements about support of this standard in their compilers please? Jhc supports all the language features of haskell 2010 except pattern guards. (ironic as I am a