I would like to formally propose that Monad become a subclass of Applicative, with a call for consensus by 1 February.
The change is described on the wiki at http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Functor-Applicative-Monad_Proposal, and ticketed
at http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4834.
As th
John Smith wrote:
> I would like to formally propose that Monad become a subclass of
> Applicative, with a call for consensus by 1 February.
I would prefer that we have some proposal like class aliases implemented
before we start fundamental restructuring of basic type classes. This
would help to
Dear Mr. Hudak,
I understand the need for a change with respect to the Haskell server
and would be very grateful if you will run the old server also in
January 2011.
(Recently I have written some mails concerning the migration problems
to Haskell.org.)
Than I can try to transfer the Yarrow
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:35:22AM -0800, Don Stewart wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> The move is complete. There are no haskell.org services running there
> now. You could shut down the machine in December if you wish.
Everyone keeps saying "the move is complete" but I'm not sure it's
really true. I unde
Hi Brent,
On 14.12.2010, at 16:02, Brent Yorgey wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:35:22AM -0800, Don Stewart wrote:
Hi Paul,
The move is complete. There are no haskell.org services running there
now. You could shut down the machine in December if you wish.
Everyone keeps saying "the move is
it was just pointed out to me that
http://www.haskell.org/~pairwise/intro/intro.html
is missing, which is linked from the tutorial page.
I don't own that page but I'm forwarding the observation here in case
someone else thinks they do...
Ben
--
http://www.hawaga.org.uk/ben/
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:02:29AM -0500, Brent Yorgey wrote:
> Everyone keeps saying "the move is complete" but I'm not sure it's
> really true. I understand in theory that people were given ample time
> and warning to migrate content, but in practice it has not worked.
> Off the top of my head I
Google’s Huge Change and How it affects you.
•Anyone can now post bad reviews and kill your rank.
•We post good reviews and improve your rank.
•We post good reviews to keep others from killing your rank.
Google: Judge, Jury and Online Shopping Executioner
Google rank is based on rev
Everyone keeps saying "the move is complete" but I'm not sure it's
really true. I understand in theory that people were given ample time
and warning to migrate content, but in practice it has not worked.
.. Are there any
plans to copy over things like this? Relying on "maintiners" to do it
has o
Hi,
> Then posting the list of missing URLs here might alert those
> who care about them (or not, but at least fewer things would
> disappear silently).
OK, here are a few broken links I happen to care about:
Old Haskell Workshop proceedings, including the very first one.
They are on the Haskel
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:48:47PM +, Henrik Nilsson wrote:
> Also, the www.haskell.org/yampa page is gone. Very out of date,
> no doubt, but even so. Sorry, probably a FAQ, but this move
> has essentially passed me by: any way I can get at the old
> content before the old server is decommissi
I'm sure this question has been asked many times but I have not been able to
find it anywhere.
I have written the code below into Lekseh directly from the RWH book.
However, I always get the error
parse error on input 'getString' and the line number refers to the type
declaration for getSt
Hi,
Make sure the line
data JValue ...
is not indented. I should start at the first column.
Patrick
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:28 PM, dhjdhj wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm sure this question has been asked many times but I have not been able to
> find it anywhere.
>
>
> I have written the code below i
OMG --- that was it --- I can't tell you how many hours I have been wrestling
with this.
Thank you so much for the quick response.
I was aware that Haskell required indentation for some things (and I'm a fan of
indentation) but I didn't realize it required NO indentation for some things
--- I
On Tuesday 14 December 2010 22:44:23, David Jameson wrote:
> OMG --- that was it --- I can't tell you how many hours I have been
> wrestling with this.
>
> Thank you so much for the quick response.
>
> I was aware that Haskell required indentation for some things (and I'm a
> fan of indentation) bu
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Hudak, Paul wrote:
> My research group is paying $200/month to maintain the old haskell.org at
> Yale, and we cannot continue doing this indefinitely -- indeed, I had hoped
> that we could have turned off the machine by now. I propose that we shut
> down the ol
16 matches
Mail list logo
