My experience with the mac stuff is that you are just better off
building everything yourself. It runs in the background while you go
eat dinner and then you are done.
-Alex-
Hugo Pacheco wrote:
The binaries do work in Leopard, but it misses all library files, such
as System.IO.
How can I bu
Will this also work with Tiger or do I have to upgrade?
-Alex-
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.8.2
==
When you want automated deriving of show/read etc., you need all the
components of your type also to be instances of show/read but you won't
want to *require* them to be automatically generated verions.
Standalone deriving does the wrong thing here. Standalone deriving
should not cause an ove
Actually independent deriving would help a lot but am not sure of the
syntax.
could it be something like
derive (Ord,Eq,Read,Show,Typeable) (BlogEntry Name Title Body Emai)
Perhaps this is what Neil Mitchell was suggesting with Derive that I was
not understanding. If I can use derive like
I'm not sure I understand how this solves my problem. Its possible that
I can use Derive not to need all the newtype declarations at all, but,
if I do need them, I'm not sure how Derive reduces the overall amount of
boilerplate here.
Perhaps I should define a TH function that takes
$(ne
Consider this module for a blog entry that I will want to put in various
generic collections that require Ord
{-# OPTIONS -fglasgow-exts #-}
module Blog.Types where
import Data.Typeable
import Data.Generics
data BlogEntry = Entry EpochSeconds Name Email Title Body
