On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:18:47AM -0600, Kevin S. Millikin wrote:
> >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Clearwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Chris> LIAR. You want to steal my idea for yourself! It's MINE! :)
>
> I hate to be the one to break it
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:07:48PM +0100, Thomas Johnsson wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes I am. But the + should be in CPS form anyways to be perfectly
> > correct, so: natural n c = (+) n 1 (\m -> c n : (natural m))
> >
>
> I think Jerzy (in his usual polite manner :-) refers to the
every group has
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 01:51:57PM +0100, Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
> Chris Clearwater wrote:
> >It seems to
> >me you could get some of the desired effects of lazy evaluation by using
> >continuation passing style in code. For example, take this psuedo-code
> >using C
I wonder if I could run an idea I've had by this list. It seems to
me you could get some of the desired effects of lazy evaluation by using
continuation passing style in code. For example, take this psuedo-code
using CPS to represent an infinite data type.
Using non-CPS this would be something
I wonder if I could run an idea I've had by this list. It seems to
me you could get some of the desired effects of lazy evaluation by using
continuation passing style in code. For example, take this psuedo-code
using CPS to represent an infinite data type.
Using non-CPS this would be something
