On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:34 PM, Steffen Schuldenzucker wrote:
> On 06/28/2011 08:25 PM, Krzysztof Skrzętnicki wrote:
>> What about Literate Haskell then? People write a lot of LH blog posts,
>> so it would seem to be quite flexible.
>
> IMHO, these are different tasks.
>
> * "Embed Haskell into so
Part of the dominance of scripting languages is clean support for heredocs. So
much of every arena of life comes down to getting "It's not about me!" I love
Haskell but it doesn't get this. Imagine a document that's nominally Haskell,
but about 80% some other language such as TeX (e.g. code for
On May 26, 2010, at 2:51 AM, Ryan Trinkle wrote:
> I don't think this licensing issue will be a problem for us. It's not clear
> to me that our game violates this new term, and we certainly don't violate
> any of the principles Steve Jobs used to justify it. If Apple wants to
> reject our app
On Jan 16, 2009, at 2:00 AM, Apfelmus, Heinrich wrote:
Rodney Price wrote:
So where do I as a practicing programmer and researcher go to learn
all
this stuff?
...
In the long term, the aim of the Haskell Wikibook is to become a
gentle
introduction to "this stuff. It's nowhere near finis
On Jul 11, 2008, at 5:47 AM, Chad Wilson wrote:
From previous experience with this sort of thing (the expansion of
usage for a list(s)), I am thinking you guys have entered a territory
better served by a forum. One subscription gets you access to the
cafe, announcements, n00b section, teachers,
