On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 10:12:46AM +1000, Richard Watson wrote:
> I'd like to add my vote for this. Its removal would result in a nicer language
> specification, and would remove a obstacle that novice programmers sometimes
> stumble over.
Yes, getting a sytax error if I write (x-1)*(-x-1) is a r
Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> URI is an instance of Show, so you can just apply 'show' to get a string.
You are one of those persons who eat the cooking book, are you? He
wanted a string representation of the resource identified by the
URI. :-)
Yours, Florian
I am trying to parse some files using the parsec combinator library
and am stuck in some kind of monad mismatch or general blindness or
so. For the sake of this argument, the documents to be parsed are just
a list of things:
document :: Parser [Thing]
Parsing the things with
thing :: Parser Thi
Doug Ransom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> none will miss spending a couple of weeks at the end of the
> development cycle trying to find a memory leak.
Apart from the fact that they are called space leaks, a lazy
functional language will not help them with this problem. It may
rather aggravate it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk) writes:
> Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:17:15 +0200, Erik Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> > Haskell#
> This is what worries me: modifying a bunch of languages to make them
> incompatible with the rest of the world
How did they say on segfault.org:
Micros
Olaf Chitil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The latter is exactly what I do and how 99% of the information about
> tools and libraries were collected. The main page of haskell.org asks
> for information about projects, compilers, papers, classes, or anything
> else but we hardly receive any.
This i
