,
Kenny Zhuo Ming Lu
School Of Computing
National University of Singapore
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
actly the same as what
> GHC will build
> automatically from the "conventional" instance
> declaration.
Yes, exactly, I realized that after I compiled the
code with -fext-core flag. Is it because it tries to
avoid building infinite evidence constructors?
Thanks for pointi
ies to evaluate
myeq_ListofInt. Here we assume operation semantic is
call-by-value.
If the operation semantic is call-by-name, this
program will terminates.
Here I am just making a wild guess how ghc is
implemented.
Can someone verify whether this is true?
Regards,
-Kenny
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://sg.search.yahoo.com
___
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
e specific than [2] or the
other way round?
I am confused.
-Kenny
--- H X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Date: Mon,
29 Sep 2003 13:10:25 +0800 (CST)
> From: H X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: GHC allow-overlapping-instances
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Sloane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kenny Lu Zhuo Ming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: RE: palm?
> Hi Kenny,
>
> > How about PocketPC? any porting is done on that?
>
&g
t;> Syntax error! The symbol
`__extension__' does not fit here.
Can someone tell me when it probably goes
wrong?
Thanks in advance!
Kenny
