anges
See http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/AutoForms for more information.
Greetings,
Mads Lindstrøm
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
ion stack
overflow
What surprises me is that I still need to look at `second`, even though
I use BarB. I thought I was swapping the parameters. Whats more changing
the line:
type instance BarB a b = Foo b
to
type instance BarB a b = Foo a -- the last letter changed
has no effect.
Greetin
t;apply" the 'a' I can do:
instance Bar (Foo a) where ...
But what if I want to "apply" the 'b' ? How do I do that ?
Greetings,
Mads Lindstrøm
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
] Fejl 1
Why is it Haddock cannot find the Bar module? After all I mention Bar.hs
in the invocation of haddock.
Greetings,
Mads Lindstrøm
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
Hi All Haskeleers
The function System.system (:: String -> IO ExitCode) makes the OS
execute it first parameter as a command. It prints its output to
standard output and standard error.
How do I easily capture this output?
/Mads Lindst
comments will be much appreciated.
Greetings,
Mads Lindstrøm
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
dy existing meant-for-GHC
programs?
/Mads Lindstrøm
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
type TellingName a = \a -> String
/Mads Lindstrøm
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
creates of FAD, using it?
If you are using FAD, what are your experiences with it?
I am mainly interested in the macro level. That is modules, classes,
class instances, ... Not in modellering the internals of a function.
Greetings,
Mads Lindstrøm
said was that
SYB, opposed to Java-type reflection, has compile-time type checking.
Well, most of its constructs are checked at compile-time.
/Mads Lindstrøm
> - Generic Haskell is effectively a Haskell generator
> Ralf
> P.S.: Another way to get *compile-time* reflection in Haskell is
Hi Srinivas Nedunuri
> I'm sure this question has been asked before, (but unf. the Haskell archives
> aren't searchable without downloading each month seperately), so I hope
You can search here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/haskell@haskell.org/
> nobody minds me asking again. Is there any way to
gmapQ (\_ -> 1) x
and it works. However, it does seem ugly to have an extra argument, just
to please the type checker.
This extra argument can fortunately be limited to a few functions, in
the program I am working on.
/Mads Lindstrøm
Wolfgang Jeltsch:
> Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 14:5
a. (Data a) => Constr -> a
I do not know where to add it either.
Hope, somebody can enlighten me.
Greetings,
Mads Lindstrøm
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
oo Int
Is this possible? if yes, how does one do it?
--
Mads Lindstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
I'am confused about the "funlhs" production, in "Report on the programming
Language Haskell 98" of the 1st February 1999.
In the report one of the "funlhs"-productions is (see page 127):
funlhs -> var apat {apat}
That is a followed by one to many . But you can have functions
like th
15 matches
Mail list logo