On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:29:26AM -0500, Sean E. Russell wrote:
Here's my base case:
someFunc :: String - IO [a]
...
ax - someFunc a
bx - someFunc b
assertBool fail $ length ax == length bx
...What I'd much rather have is:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:20:35AM -0800, John Meacham wrote:
case x of
foo - Foo
bar - Bar
fuzz - Fuzz
fuzo - Fuzo
x - other .. thing
The reason I ask is I am writing someting which will generate large case
statements like the first form and want
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:37:16AM +0200, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 04:25:41AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.
main = do text - readFile test
let something = somefunc text
writeFile test $! something
Are both of these correct (guaranteed to give
Hello!
Building htk, I've got an error:
TestGetPut.hs:6:
Module `GetPut' is located in package `Main'
but its interface file claims it is part of package
`uni-events-test'
It happened (as far as I got) when ghc saw in current path
the *.hi file built for installation. There are
So why one might need it? I've never used Rational, but, if
asked, I would say that they are for exact representation
of numbers (some symbolic calcs). On the other side, 'real'
dotted numbers always represent some real values with finite
accuracy. That's look like a bad idea to me to call
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:29:13PM +, C.Reinke wrote:
2. When I hear translate to HTML I imagine that underlined
words which can be clicked to see, say, definition of
function. Sadly, most htmlizers are focused on highlighting
rather than navigation.
Why generate HTML pages if noone
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 03:05:34PM +1100, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote:
Again, XEmacs with the above mentioned Haskell mode can do
it. Just execute the function `htmlize-buffer' on a buffer
containing the Haskell source. As an example for the
generated output, have a look at
You're right with this (and the rest too). In did not
pretend to play an expert. I just shared my impression.
Anyway, I think there are many reasons to learn functional
programming first, and then haskell as an implementation.
Max.
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 12:47:34AM -0800, Simon Peyton-Jones
Hi!
I'm far not an expert in Haskell, but I'll venture to say
I'm in. I'm not an CS student and I have never been (I
learned Solid State Physics). I became there in about 6
months without paying a cent. Well, I paid for dialup. I
also spent a lot of time. My wife should hate Haskell.
I would
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:48:44PM +0100, George Russell wrote:
In any case it looks fairly simple to write. If only I were set up to be able
to compile GHC I could write the necessary code myself . . .
There's no need to rebuild the entire ghc system to hack the
data package. You onky need
Hi.
That's my hacked syntax files
Max.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 02:22:07PM +, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
Hi,
The Vim syntax file for literate Haskell programs handles code lines that
begin with a '' character fine. But in GHC much of the code is defined
between \begin{code} and
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:27:37PM +0200, Ch. A. Herrmann wrote:
Removing them would possibly cause problems with existing programs
and this is definitely not my aim. However, it'll make sense to
think about long-term improvements. I wouldn't call Float and Double
enumeration types. Maybe,
I didn't try ghc-5.02 since I haven't installed it yet.
Could you do that? The IO library in 5.00.2 had a bug in fdToHandle
which meant that it didn't put the file descriptor into non-blocking
mode, and I suspect this is the cause of your problem.
It works. Thank you.
Max.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 04:47:25PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
I tried this here on Linux/x86 with 5.02 and it seems to work fine.
Instead of the tcl/tk script you mentioned I used a FIFO in /tmp/fifo
and made the runProcess just call cat /tmp/fifo.
Which GHC version and platform is this on?
14 matches
Mail list logo
