Hi Krasmir,
It is possible that you may be running up against one of GMail's
ideosynchrosies. I have found that GMail tries to avoid showing
multiple copies of the same mail. In particular, if one sends a mail
to a list that one is subscribed to, one will not see a second copy of
the mail when it
On 11/28/05, Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As I already said, this approach may lead to mixing different concepts.
> Example:
>
> data Person = Person { name :: String }
> data File = File { name :: String }
>
> A field identifier has to be seen in context of the d
On 11/23/05, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:32:47PM +0000, Rob Ennals wrote:
[snip]
> > 1. Field namespaces: solved by using type classes
>
> But these classes are required to be manually specified, right? This avoids
> the pro
Hi guys,
Since discussion has returned to records, it might be useful for me to
post a link to a proposal that I knocked up a while back when this
topic came up a few years ago:
http://www.cambridge.intel-research.net/~rennals/records.pdf
The basic idea is to keep records largely as they are, bu
