On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 07:08:22PM -0700, Mike Jones wrote:
> Is there a way to define (:=) to be (<-) in the context of a do?
> The goal is to make the language look Pascal like for those who will use it.
I'd say that goal is ill-concieved. If you are trying to help
people learn functional pro
I get a lot of messages. Something's wrong with your subscription.
Tim
On Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 04:08:18AM +0200, Juergen A. Erhard wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Just trying whether this list is alive...
>
>(But even if, it is probably effectively dead... I subscribed
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 04:07:37PM +0200, Jan de Wit wrote:
>- It can automatically convert your code from
> all_words_lowercase_and_separated_by_underscore mode to
> firstWordLowercaseAndTheRestCapitalized mode,
The flag --change_underscoresToCaps should, I think, be named
--change_underscores
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 03:18:02PM -0800, Bill Halchin wrote:
>I am trying to build the HaXML stuff and the linker (ld) is
>looking for an archive, gmp.a, which I don't have installed. Can
>anybody lead me in the right direction??
I believe that's the GNU multi-precision arithmetic library.
