On Wednesday 15 September 2004 08:44, Krasimir Angelov wrote:
> The Sigbjorn Finne's .NET integration is also ported
> to GHC but I am not sure whether it is efficient
> enough. The bridge uses reflection to call .NET
> methods and each time when the method is called it is
> located by its name.
W
On Tuesday 14 September 2004 18:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> * Can't much of the simplicity of the Haskell code also be
> reached by just switching from C++ to something like Java or C#?
> (Probably an example from the application domain will be most
> convincing. So I probably have to bit
On Thursday 01 April 2004 00:47, John Peterson wrote:
> * Movie making capabilities
Do you describe animation as in fran, or do you just describe each frame
separately?
V.
--
A: Top posting!
Q: What is the most irritating thing on Usenet?
___
Has
Alle 00:57, lunedì 26 gennaio 2004, Ben Rudiak-Gould ha scritto:
> Here's a possible syntax. An expression like (123, ^x = "foo") would
> have the type (Integer, ^x :: String), which is like a tuple but with
> all but one of the elements having a name. An expression like
>
> (123, ^x="foo") - (45
Alle 17:51, martedì 25 novembre 2003, Ross Paterson ha scritto:
> - Integrated .NET support (on Windows).
What does this exactly mean? And, besides, is there any hope of
supporting mono?
V.
--
Money for nothing, that's the way you do it
[Dire Straits]
