mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
>
--
Yoann Padioleau, INSA de Rennes, France,
Opinions expressed here are only mine. Je n'écris qu'à titre personnel.
** Get Free. Be Smart. Simply use Linux and Free Software
there is the perl version of the diff algorithm on CPAN that may be
a better starting point than the C version.
--
Yoann Padioleau, INSA de Rennes, France,
Opinions expressed here are only mine. Je n'écris qu'à titre personnel.
** Get Free. Be Smart. Simply use
George Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yoann Padioleau wrote:
> >
> > George Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > This is a well-known problem. The most helpful Web page I could find about it
>is here:
&g
__
> Haskell mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
>
--
Yoann Padioleau, INSA de Rennes, France,
Opinions expressed here are only mine. Je n'écris qu'à titre personn
Martin Sulzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yoann Padioleau writes:
> > nevertheless i found constructor class more elegant for many problems.
> > Your solution is less elegant that the one using constructor classes.
> >
>
> Yes, the current presentatio
is not allowed, cause leads to undecidable type inference
>
> {-
> instance (Fmap a b c d, Fmap e f a b) => Fmap e f c d
>where fmap2 h = fmap2 (fmap2 h)
> -}
>
> comp :: (Fmap fa1 fb1 fa fb, Fmap a b fa1 fb1) =>
> (a -> b) -> fa -> fb
> comp h = fmap2 (fmap2 h)
>
>
>
> ___
Lars Lundgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 26 Sep 2002, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
>
> > Koen Claessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > i find your idea very good.
> > indeed for the library GetOpt, the argument of a program never change so it
&g
e
> - getting arguments
> - getting environment variables
> - downloading a webpage
> - ...
>
> What do you think?
>
> Regards,
> /Koen.
>
> --
> Koen Claessen
> http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~koen
> Chalmers University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
>
&
e
> to write more succinct versions?
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Hal
>
> --
> Hal Daume III
>
> "Computer science is no more about computers | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> than astronomy is about telescopes." -Dijkstra | www.isi.edu/~hdaume
>
> ___
a raytracer, a thing that many student like
cos
you can then play with it and describe your own scene, and that contest show that
ocaml/haskell were really cool for doing graphism-related work.
>
>
> hope this helps. I'm happy to provide more detail.
--
Yoann Padioleau, INSA
#x27;m saying is that Haskell's standard abstraction facilities mean
> that even in the IO monad your programming experience can
> significantly better than that of a C programmer. (Of course your
> experience can also be worse if you don't or can&#x
11 matches
Mail list logo
