Re: [Haskell] Current XML libraries status

Hi Marc, Thanks for the pointer. Fortunately I don't have this problem. Probably 2GB of memory are enough to parse 20MB file even with this space leak. HXML still works better than the other libraries and has a nice API so I use it. The patch is useful but it is not applied. I also did some other

Re: [Haskell] Current XML libraries status

there was a thread about xml parsing, one month ago. well, i don't know much about xml, except what it looks like; but i know about that interesting parsing problem behind it. maybe Lev Walkin has fixed that in HXML. at least he wrote thi

Re: [Haskell] Current XML libraries status

"Krasimir Angelov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does some one have made performance tests on the different XML libraries for > Haskell? I have a 20MB xml file that I want to read. I remember from my > earlier > experiments (years ago) that all libraries were too slow and were consuming > too >

Re: [Haskell] Current XML libraries status

2008/10/24 Donnie Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello Krasimir, > > There is also the xml package from Galois: > http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/xml That looks nice. Are there any examples of its usage? --vk ___ Haskell maili

Re: [Haskell] Current XML libraries status

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David F. Place wrote: > I've used HaXml's SAX parser to parse huge XML files. It is surprising > that HXT doesn't seem to have a SAX parser as I understand that it is > the successor to HaXml. DOM style parsing won't work with huge files. It can wi

Re: [Haskell] Current XML libraries status

I've used HaXml's SAX parser to parse huge XML files. It is surprising that HXT doesn't seem to have a SAX parser as I understand that it is the successor to HaXml. DOM style parsing won't work with huge files. http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/HaXml/1.19/doc/html/Text- XML-Ha

Re: [Haskell] Current XML libraries status

Hello Krasimir, There is also the xml package from Galois: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/xml Hope that helps. __ Donnie 2008/10/23 Krasimir Angelov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > > Does some one have made performance tests on the different XML libraries > for Haskell

Re: [Haskell] Current XML libraries status

I remember that HaXML has also a lazy XML parser. maybe if you just need to use some specific information stored in your XML file you can earn some time/memory with it.From my experience, HXT seems faster. Cheers, hugo 2008/10/23 Krasimir Angelov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > > Does some one have

[Haskell] Current XML libraries status

Hi, Does some one have made performance tests on the different XML libraries for Haskell? I have a 20MB xml file that I want to read. I remember from my earlier experiments (years ago) that all libraries were too slow and were consuming too much memory. I hoped that this situation had changed but