.
I'm inclined to stick to the H98 story.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iavor Diatchki
| Sent: 15 October 2007 20:35
| To: haskell@haskell.org
| Subject: [Haskell] Module system question
|
| Hello,
|
| I have a question
Hello,
On 10/16/07, Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The H98 report is pretty clear about there being a single name space for type
constructors and classes. Yes, in certain circumstances it's unambiguous.
In Hugs, can you write
module M where
class C a
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:34:37PM +0300, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
I like the Hugs behavior because it accepts more programs. OTOH,
GHC's behavior may be a bit simpler to explain and implement(?). Any
thoughts?
Currently, the class and datatype namespaces are considered the same by
the
Hello,
I have a question concerning Haskell's module system.
Consider the following example which defines three modules A,B, and C:
module A where { data X = X }
module B where { class X a }
module C where { import A; import B; data Y = Y X }
The question is: Is there an ambiguity error in
