On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:51 -0500, John Peterson wrote:
> The reason that MediaWiki was installed on haskell.org is that people
> that know how to install and use MediaWiki (Ashley and others)
> volunteered to do all the work.
That's fair.
> If we want to move up to Drupal we need someone that
The reason that MediaWiki was installed on haskell.org is that people
that know how to install and use MediaWiki (Ashley and others)
volunteered to do all the work. If we want to move up to Drupal we
need someone that is willing to install, maintain, and transfer
content. If this is something you
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 19:52 -0500, John Peterson wrote:
> This isn't a completely "done deal" - there is still time to object to
> the whole thing or make suggestions. Nothing will be visible to the
> outside world until we make the switch later. But I believe this will
> result in a much better
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 21:12 -0500, John Peterson wrote:
> >> wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
> >> compatible.
>
> >As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
> >the haskell wiki, and just want to "steal" it for my project, I'm not
> >allowed
On 1/9/06, John Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As everyone has noticed during the "making Haskell more open"
> discussion, MediaWiki was suggested as a better wiki technology for
> haskell.org. Ashley Yakeley has generously installed MediaWiki and we
> would like to migrate the main pages o
On 1/9/06, Anders Höckersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sön 2006-01-08 klockan 21:12 -0500 skrev John Peterson:
> > >> wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
> > >> compatible.
> >
> > >As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
> > >the haskell wi
sön 2006-01-08 klockan 21:12 -0500 skrev John Peterson:
> >> wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
> >> compatible.
>
> >As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
> >the haskell wiki, and just want to "steal" it for my project, I'm not
> >allowed
> This is something worth debating. Certainly you can ask the author of
> the code for permission to use it but this is an extra burden. Would
> be nice to have a special wiki construct to mark content as posessing
> an "extra" license. The whole license debate should take place as
> soon as pos
>> wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
>> compatible.
>As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
>the haskell wiki, and just want to "steal" it for my project, I'm not
>allowed to, unless I also release my code under the GNU FDL?
This is someth
> wiki is under the GNU FDL so the licenses are not necessarily
> compatible.
As far as I understand, this means that if I see a sample of code on
the haskell wiki, and just want to "steal" it for my project, I'm not
allowed to, unless I also release my code under the GNU FDL?
And another point,
As everyone has noticed during the "making Haskell more open"
discussion, MediaWiki was suggested as a better wiki technology for
haskell.org. Ashley Yakeley has generously installed MediaWiki and we
would like to migrate the main pages of haskell.org into this wiki.
The migration is not complete
11 matches
Mail list logo
