On 06 May 2005 18:33, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On 5/6/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(d) I hoped that something like grafting would provide a more
general solution.
Grafting sounds like a very nice solution just from the name, but I
don't recall hearing of it before. Where
On 5/9/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06 May 2005 18:33, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On 5/6/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(d) I hoped that something like grafting would provide a more
general solution.
Grafting sounds like a very nice solution just from the
On 03 May 2005 22:13, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
Problem: We need a way to simplify module imports.
Problem details:
* Hierarchical module names are getting really long (including a
functional area, a package name, and a module name).
* People typically import multiple modules from
On 5/6/05, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(d) I hoped that something like grafting would provide a more
general solution.
Grafting sounds like a very nice solution just from the name, but I
don't recall hearing of it before. Where can I read about it?
Problem: We need a way to simplify module imports.
Problem details:
* Hierarchical module names are getting really long (including a
functional area, a package name, and a module name).
* People typically import multiple modules from areas close to each
other in the hierarchical module
